Olbrechts tyteca (46 Ergebnisse)

Zustand: good. Gently used with minimal wear on the corners and cover. A few pages may contain light highlighting or writing, but the text remains fully legible. Dust jacket may be missing, and supplemental materials like CDs or codes may not be included. May be ex-library with library markings. Ships promptly. …

Paperback. Zustand: Fair. No Jacket. Readable copy. Pages may have considerable notes/highlighting. ~ ThriftBooks: Read More, Spend Less.

Paperback. Zustand: Fair. New edition. The item might be beaten up but readable. May contain markings or highlighting, as well as stains, bent corners, or any other major defect, but the text is not obscured in any way.

Zustand: Good. New Ed. Pages intact with minimal writing/highlighting. The binding may be loose and creased. Dust jackets/supplements are not included. Stock photo provided. Product includes identifying sticker. Better World Books: Buy Books. Do Good.

Hardcover. Zustand: Good. Zustand des Schutzumschlags: no jacket (paperback). Second printing 1971. This paperback edition is in good condition. The cover shows minor wear, typical for its age, but remains intact with no major creases or tears. The binding is strong, and the pages are clean with no inscriptions or markings. Overall, a well-preserved copy suitable for both reading and collection.…

thick PAPERBACK, very good copy with scuffed covers, text itself appears little used if at allq. PERELMAN, CHAIM / OLBRECHTS-TYTECA, LUCIE. The new rhetoric: a treatise on argumentation. Notre Dame, Indiana: University of Notre Dame Press, 1971, x, 566pp., . NDP 120. - CONTENTS: pt. 1. The framework of argumentation -- pt. 2. The starting point of argument. Agreement ; The choice of data and their adaptation for argumentative purposes ; Presentation of data and form of the discourse -- pt. 3. Techniques of argumentation. Quasi-logical arguments ; Arguments based on the structure of reality ; The relations establishing the structure of reality ; The dissociation of concepts ; The interaction of arguments. ISBN 0268004463.…

Zustand: gut. 734 S., 21 cm, Ecke leicht geknickt, Einband mit Kugelschreibermarkierungen, Einleitung mit wenigen Bleistiftanstreichungen, aus der Sammlung Hans-Joachim Krämer. Sprache: Französisch.

Zustand: New.

Brossura. Zustand: molto buono. Volume integro, fresco all'interno, copertina flessibile, foto su richiesta.

Paperback. Zustand: New. Brand new book, sourced directly from publisher. Dispatch time is 24-48 hours from our warehouse. Book will be sent in robust, secure packaging to ensure it reaches you securely.

Zustand: New. pp. 576.

Paperback. Zustand: New. The New Rhetoric is founded on the idea that since "argumentation aims at securing the adherence of those to whom it is addressed, it is, in its entirety, relative to the audience to be influenced," says Chaïm Perelman and L. Olbrechts-Tyteca, and they rely, in particular, for their theory of argumentation on the twin concepts of universal and particular audiences: while every argument is directed to a specific individual or group, the orator decides what information and what approaches will achieve the greatest adherence according to an ideal audience. This ideal, Perelman explains, can be embodied, for example, "in God, in all reasonable and competent men, in the man deliberating or in an elite." Like particular audiences, then, the universal audience is never fixed or absolute but depends on the orator, the content and goals of the argument, and the particular audience to whom the argument is addressed. These considerations determine what information constitutes "facts" and "reasonableness" and thus help to determine the universal audience that, in turn, shapes the orator's approach. The adherence of an audience is also determined by the orator's use of values, a further key concept of the New Rhetoric. Perelman's treatment of value and his view of epideictic rhetoric sets his approach apart from that of the ancients and of Aristotle in particular. Aristotle's division of rhetoric into three genres-forensic, deliberative, and epideictic-is largely motivated by the judgments required for each: forensic or legal arguments require verdicts on past action, deliberative or political rhetoric seeks judgment on future action, and epideictic or ceremonial rhetoric concerns values associated with praise or blame and seeks no specific decisions. For Aristotle, the epideictic genre was of limited importance in the civic realm since it did not concern facts or policies. Perelman, in contrast, believes not only that epideictic rhetoric warrants more attention, but that the values normally limited to that genre are in fact central to all argumentation. "Epideictic oratory," Perelman argues, "has significant and important argumentation for strengthening the disposition toward action by increasing adherence to the values it lauds." These values are central to the persuasiveness of arguments in all rhetorical genres since the orator always attempts to "establish a sense of communion centered around particular values recognized by the audience.". …

cloth. Zustand: Gut. 2nd ed. 566 S. Good. Ex-library with usual markings. Clean pages. Sprache: Englisch Gewicht in Gramm: 1015.

Paperback. Zustand: New. The New Rhetoric is founded on the idea that since "argumentation aims at securing the adherence of those to whom it is addressed, it is, in its entirety, relative to the audience to be influenced," says Chaïm Perelman and L. Olbrechts-Tyteca, and they rely, in particular, for their theory of argumentation on the twin concepts of universal and particular audiences: while every argument is directed to a specific individual or group, the orator decides what information and what approaches will achieve the greatest adherence according to an ideal audience. This ideal, Perelman explains, can be embodied, for example, "in God, in all reasonable and competent men, in the man deliberating or in an elite." Like particular audiences, then, the universal audience is never fixed or absolute but depends on the orator, the content and goals of the argument, and the particular audience to whom the argument is addressed. These considerations determine what information constitutes "facts" and "reasonableness" and thus help to determine the universal audience that, in turn, shapes the orator's approach. The adherence of an audience is also determined by the orator's use of values, a further key concept of the New Rhetoric. Perelman's treatment of value and his view of epideictic rhetoric sets his approach apart from that of the ancients and of Aristotle in particular. Aristotle's division of rhetoric into three genres-forensic, deliberative, and epideictic-is largely motivated by the judgments required for each: forensic or legal arguments require verdicts on past action, deliberative or political rhetoric seeks judgment on future action, and epideictic or ceremonial rhetoric concerns values associated with praise or blame and seeks no specific decisions. For Aristotle, the epideictic genre was of limited importance in the civic realm since it did not concern facts or policies. Perelman, in contrast, believes not only that epideictic rhetoric warrants more attention, but that the values normally limited to that genre are in fact central to all argumentation. "Epideictic oratory," Perelman argues, "has significant and important argumentation for strengthening the disposition toward action by increasing adherence to the values it lauds." These values are central to the persuasiveness of arguments in all rhetorical genres since the orator always attempts to "establish a sense of communion centered around particular values recognized by the audience.". …

Zustand: Nuevo.

Zustand: Good. Envoi rapide dos et bas de tranche (au niveau du dos) tachés quelques passages soulignés au stylo. in8. 1970. Broché. Good.

Zustand: good. Befriedigend/Good: Durchschnittlich erhaltenes Buch bzw. Schutzumschlag mit Gebrauchsspuren, aber vollständigen Seiten. / Describes the average WORN book or dust jacket that has all the pages present.

Zustand: New. In English.

Paperback. Zustand: Brand New. new edition edition. 576 pages. 9.00x6.00x1.50 inches. In Stock.

Tapa Blanda. Zustand: Muy bien. Título original "Traité de l'argumentation. La nouvelle rhéthorique" traducción de Julia Sevilla Muñoz. MUY BUEN ejemplar con algún subrayado a lápiz. 855pp.

Brossurato In Due Volumi. Qualche Traccia Del Tempo,Come La Copertina Sbiadita E Le Pagine Ingiallite,Ma Nel Complesso Buona Copia. Collana "Reprints" Einaudi. Non Comune.

Zustand: Very Good. *Price HAS BEEN REDUCED by 10% until Monday, Nov. 9 (weekend SALE item)* 734 pp., paperback, spine faded, else very good. - If you are reading this, this item is actually (physically) in our stock and ready for shipment once ordered. We are not bookjackers. Buyer is responsible for any additional duties, taxes, or fees required by recipient's country.…

Zustand: Gebraucht / Used. Paperback, Spine sl. Creased. 734pp.

Zustand: MOLTO BUONO. Padova, Cedam Casa Editrice Dott. Antonio Milani cm.17x24, pp.434, brossura. Collana Archivio di Filosofia, Organo dell' istituto di Studi Filosofici. Direttore Enrico Castelli.

Zustand: NEW.

Hardcover. Zustand: Good. Hardcover. No DJ. 2nd printing, 1971. Pages are clean and unmarked. Covers show light edge wear with some tanning/foxing spots. Binding is tight, hinges strong. Previous owner's bookplate on end paper.; 100% Satisfaction Guaranteed! Ships same or next business day.

Paperback. Zustand: New. The New Rhetoric is founded on the idea that since "argumentation aims at securing the adherence of those to whom it is addressed, it is, in its entirety, relative to the audience to be influenced," says Chaïm Perelman and L. Olbrechts-Tyteca, and they rely, in particular, for their theory of argumentation on the twin concepts of universal and particular audiences: while every argument is directed to a specific individual or group, the orator decides what information and what approaches will achieve the greatest adherence according to an ideal audience. This ideal, Perelman explains, can be embodied, for example, "in God, in all reasonable and competent men, in the man deliberating or in an elite." Like particular audiences, then, the universal audience is never fixed or absolute but depends on the orator, the content and goals of the argument, and the particular audience to whom the argument is addressed. These considerations determine what information constitutes "facts" and "reasonableness" and thus help to determine the universal audience that, in turn, shapes the orator's approach. The adherence of an audience is also determined by the orator's use of values, a further key concept of the New Rhetoric. Perelman's treatment of value and his view of epideictic rhetoric sets his approach apart from that of the ancients and of Aristotle in particular. Aristotle's division of rhetoric into three genres-forensic, deliberative, and epideictic-is largely motivated by the judgments required for each: forensic or legal arguments require verdicts on past action, deliberative or political rhetoric seeks judgment on future action, and epideictic or ceremonial rhetoric concerns values associated with praise or blame and seeks no specific decisions. For Aristotle, the epideictic genre was of limited importance in the civic realm since it did not concern facts or policies. Perelman, in contrast, believes not only that epideictic rhetoric warrants more attention, but that the values normally limited to that genre are in fact central to all argumentation. "Epideictic oratory," Perelman argues, "has significant and important argumentation for strengthening the disposition toward action by increasing adherence to the values it lauds." These values are central to the persuasiveness of arguments in all rhetorical genres since the orator always attempts to "establish a sense of communion centered around particular values recognized by the audience.". …

Brossura. Zustand: new. Traduzione di C. Schik, M. Mayer e E. Barassi. Torino, 2013; br., pp. 612, cm 13,8x20,8. (Piccola Biblioteca Einaudi. Nuova Serie. 594). Dai tempi di Descartes, le scienze dimostrative sono ritenute il regno della razionalità, mentre tutto ciò che non è dimostrabile viene relegato nell'ambito dell'irrazionale. Così l'etica, la sociologia, il diritto, la psicologia, la retorica sono rimaste escluse dalla logica in senso stretto. La teoria dell'argomentazione si propone di reintrodurre la razionalità nelle scienze dell'uomo che operano con mezzi di prova non dimostrativi. I problemi connessi con l'argomentazione interessano varie discipline: dalla letteratura alla sociologia, dal diritto e alla psicologia. La teoria dell'argomentazione li affronta da un proprio punto di vista come logica delle scienze non dimostrative. Con una prefazione di Norberto Bobbio. Libro.…

paperback. Zustand: Very Good. Edizione in volume unico. Collana "Piccola Biblioteca Einaudi" - Brossura editoriale di xxii-593 pagine. Prefazione di Norberto Bobbio. Segni d'uso al dorso, peraltro copia in ottime condizioni complessive, paginazione pulita e compatta -- La finalità della Nuova Retorica è quello di recuperare le argomentazioni usate nella sfera del razionale per estenderle al «campo del preferibile», ossia dell'irrazionale, al fine di persuadere della ragionevolezza di idee solo verosimili o addirittura incerte. Il «campo del preferibile» è quello del conflitto tra valori: qui non basta una dimostrazione o un sillogismo, non esistendo certezze oggettive (da porre come premesse), ma occorre un ragionamento persuasivo basato sull'argomentazione, per arrivare a giustificare come "ragionevole" qualunque scelta. Book.…

Paperback. Zustand: New. The New Rhetoric is founded on the idea that since "argumentation aims at securing the adherence of those to whom it is addressed, it is, in its entirety, relative to the audience to be influenced," says Chaïm Perelman and L. Olbrechts-Tyteca, and they rely, in particular, for their theory of argumentation on the twin concepts of universal and particular audiences: while every argument is directed to a specific individual or group, the orator decides what information and what approaches will achieve the greatest adherence according to an ideal audience. This ideal, Perelman explains, can be embodied, for example, "in God, in all reasonable and competent men, in the man deliberating or in an elite." Like particular audiences, then, the universal audience is never fixed or absolute but depends on the orator, the content and goals of the argument, and the particular audience to whom the argument is addressed. These considerations determine what information constitutes "facts" and "reasonableness" and thus help to determine the universal audience that, in turn, shapes the orator's approach. The adherence of an audience is also determined by the orator's use of values, a further key concept of the New Rhetoric. Perelman's treatment of value and his view of epideictic rhetoric sets his approach apart from that of the ancients and of Aristotle in particular. Aristotle's division of rhetoric into three genres-forensic, deliberative, and epideictic-is largely motivated by the judgments required for each: forensic or legal arguments require verdicts on past action, deliberative or political rhetoric seeks judgment on future action, and epideictic or ceremonial rhetoric concerns values associated with praise or blame and seeks no specific decisions. For Aristotle, the epideictic genre was of limited importance in the civic realm since it did not concern facts or policies. Perelman, in contrast, believes not only that epideictic rhetoric warrants more attention, but that the values normally limited to that genre are in fact central to all argumentation. "Epideictic oratory," Perelman argues, "has significant and important argumentation for strengthening the disposition toward action by increasing adherence to the values it lauds." These values are central to the persuasiveness of arguments in all rhetorical genres since the orator always attempts to "establish a sense of communion centered around particular values recognized by the audience.". …