Henckels caroline (11 Ergebnisse)

Zustand: New. In English.

Zustand: New.

Paperback. Zustand: Brand New. 264 pages. 8.90x5.98x0.63 inches. In Stock.

Zustand: New.

Zustand: New. In English.

Hardcover. Zustand: Brand New. 181 pages. 9.75x6.50x0.50 inches. In Stock.

Zustand: New. In English.

Hardcover. Zustand: Brand New. 200 pages. 9.25x6.25x1.00 inches. In Stock.

Buch. Zustand: Neu. Druck auf Anfrage Neuware - Printed after ordering - In this study, Caroline Henckels examines how investment tribunals have balanced the competing interests of host states and foreign investors in determining state liability in disputes concerning the exercise of public power. Analyzing the concepts of proportionality and deference in investment tribunals' decision-making in comparative perspective, the book proposes a new methodology for investment tribunals to adopt in regulatory disputes, which combines proportionality analysis with an institutionally sensitive approach to the standard of review. Henckels argues that adopting a modified form of proportionality analysis would provide a means for tribunals to decide cases in a more consistent and coherent manner leading to greater certainty for both states and investors, and that affording due deference to host states in the determination of liability would address the concern that the decisions of investment tribunals unjustifiably impact on the regulatory autonomy of states. …

Zustand: New. Caroline Henckels examines how investment tribunals should balance competing state and investor interests in determining state liability in regulatory disputes. Series: Cambridge Studies in International and Comparative Law. Num Pages: 266 pages, black & white illustrations. BIC Classification: JPS; LBBM; LNAC5. Category: (P) Professional & Vocational. Dimension: 228 x 152 x 16. Weight in Grams: 530. . 2015. Hardcover. . . . . Books ship from the US and Ireland.…

Zustand: New. Investment treaty arbitration urgently requires a certain and consistent way of deciding regulatory disputes that pays due respect to the competing imperatives of investment protection and regulatory autonomy. Caroline Henckels argues that in such cases inv.