Eric t chester (24 Ergebnisse)

Paperback. Zustand: Fair. No Jacket. Readable copy. Pages may have considerable notes/highlighting. ~ ThriftBooks: Read More, Spend Less.

PAP. Zustand: New. New Book. Shipped from UK. Established seller since 2000.

Zustand: New.

Paperback. Zustand: Brand New. 216 pages. 8.25x5.50x8.25 inches. In Stock.

Zustand: As New. Unread book in perfect condition.

Zustand: As New. Unread book in perfect condition.

Zustand: New. 2026. paperback. . . . . . Books ship from the US and Ireland.

Zustand: As New. Unread book in perfect condition.

Paperback. Zustand: Brand New. 216 pages. 8.25x5.50x8.25 inches. In Stock.

Paperback. Zustand: Brand New. 416 pages. 8.50x5.75x1.50 inches. In Stock.

Taschenbuch. Zustand: Neu. Neuware - Silencing 'Fighting Bob' tells the story of the coordinated attack by the federal government on the progressive opponents of the First World War. As Eric Chester reminds us, the American people saw no reason for the United States to become directly involved in Europe's conflict in 1917. President Woodrow Wilson, ignoring that fact, forced the United States to join with its allies in carrying the war to the bitter end: the strategic capitulation of Germany. To accomplish this, Wilson--notably, a Democrat--was convinced that harsh repression of dissent was necessary. Reexamining a wide range of archival sources from a new angle, Chester describes the rollout of this campaign of suppression, showing that the most radical opponents of the war were the first to come under attack, beginning with the imprisonment of members of the Industrial Workers of the World and the sentencing of left-wing socialists to long terms in prison. Chester reveals that, as soon as the radical Left was quashed, the federal government turned its attention to reformists committed to working within the system--that is, Progressives, as led by Senator 'Fighting Bob' LaFollette, the Wisconsin Republican at the forefront of the Progressive movement. What does it say that, although some of the first World War's most ardent opponents were situated in the United States, few today recall that most Americans opposed the decision to enter the First World War What can we learn from the fact that it was a Democrat who brought that antiwar movement down As Chester demonstrates, history shows the struggle to uphold civil liberties can only succeed when everyone's right to dissent is defended, no matter what their views and no matter who holds power. Chester documents the process by which a Democrat who viewed himself as a reformer took down a Republican, along with the countless Progressives he counted among his allies--leaving a lasting legacy for the Democratic Party: the repression of the most potent Progressive forces in the United States.…

Zustand: NEW.

HRD. Zustand: New. New Book. Shipped from UK. Established seller since 2000.

Taschenbuch. Zustand: Neu. Neuware - A comprehensive history of the National Civil Liberties Bureau's role in the anti-war movement during the First World WarWorld War I, given all the rousing 'Over-There' songs and in-the-trenches films it inspired, was, at its outset, surprisingly unpopular with the American public. As opposition increased, Woodrow Wilson's presidential administration became intent on stifling antiwar dissent. Wilson effectively silenced the National Civil Liberties Bureau, forerunner of the American Civil Liberties Union. Presidential candidate Eugene Debs was jailed, and Deb's Socialist Party became a prime target of surveillance operations, both covert and overt. Drastic as these measures were, more draconian measures were to come.In his absorbing new book, Free Speech and the Suppression of Dissent During World War I, Eric Chester reveals that out of this turmoil came a heated public discussion on the theory of civil liberties - the basic freedoms that are, theoretically, untouchable by any of the three branches of the U.S. government. The famous 'clear and present danger' argument of Supreme Court Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes, and the 'balance of conflicting interest' theory of law professor Zechariah Chafee, for example, evolved to provide a rationale for courts to act as a limited restraint on autocratic actions of the government. But Chester goes further, to examine an alternative theory: civil liberties exist as absolute rights, rather than being dependent on the specific circumstances of each case. Over the years, the debate about the right to dissent has intensified and become more necessary. This fascinating book explains why, a century after the First World War - and in the era of Trump - we need to know about this.…

Hardcover. Zustand: Brand New. 416 pages. 9.50x6.25x1.50 inches. In Stock.

Buch. Zustand: Neu. Neuware - Silencing 'Fighting Bob' tells the story of the coordinated attack by the federal government on the progressive opponents of the First World War. As Eric Chester reminds us, the American people saw no reason for the United States to become directly involved in Europe's conflict in 1917. President Woodrow Wilson, ignoring that fact, forced the United States to join with its allies in carrying the war to the bitter end: the strategic capitulation of Germany. To accomplish this, Wilson--notably, a Democrat--was convinced that harsh repression of dissent was necessary. Reexamining a wide range of archival sources from a new angle, Chester describes the rollout of this campaign of suppression, showing that the most radical opponents of the war were the first to come under attack, beginning with the imprisonment of members of the Industrial Workers of the World and the sentencing of left-wing socialists to long terms in prison. Chester reveals that, as soon as the radical Left was quashed, the federal government turned its attention to reformists committed to working within the system--that is, Progressives, as led by Senator 'Fighting Bob' LaFollette, the Wisconsin Republican at the forefront of the Progressive movement. What does it say that, although some of the first World War's most ardent opponents were situated in the United States, few today recall that most Americans opposed the decision to enter the First World War What can we learn from the fact that it was a Democrat who brought that antiwar movement down As Chester demonstrates, history shows the struggle to uphold civil liberties can only succeed when everyone's right to dissent is defended, no matter what their views and no matter who holds power. Chester documents the process by which a Democrat who viewed himself as a reformer took down a Republican, along with the countless Progressives he counted among his allies--leaving a lasting legacy for the Democratic Party: the repression of the most potent Progressive forces in the United States.…

Zustand: NEW.

Zustand: New. 2026. hardcover. . . . . . Books ship from the US and Ireland.

Gebunden. Zustand: New. World War I, given all the rousing Over-There songs and in-the-trenches films it inspired, was, at its outset, surprisingly unpopular with the American public. As opposition increased, Woodrow Wilson s presidential administration became intent on stifling.

Zustand: New.

Zustand: New.

Buch. Zustand: Neu. Neuware - A comprehensive history of the National Civil Liberties Bureau's role in the anti-war movement during the First World WarWorld War I, given all the rousing 'Over-There' songs and in-the-trenches films it inspired, was, at its outset, surprisingly unpopular with the American public. As opposition increased, Woodrow Wilson's presidential administration became intent on stifling antiwar dissent. Wilson effectively silenced the National Civil Liberties Bureau, forerunner of the American Civil Liberties Union. Presidential candidate Eugene Debs was jailed, and Deb's Socialist Party became a prime target of surveillance operations, both covert and overt. Drastic as these measures were, more draconian measures were to come.In his absorbing new book, Free Speech and the Suppression of Dissent During World War I, Eric Chester reveals that out of this turmoil came a heated public discussion on the theory of civil liberties - the basic freedoms that are, theoretically, untouchable by any of the three branches of the U.S. government. The famous 'clear and present danger' argument of Supreme Court Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes, and the 'balance of conflicting interest' theory of law professor Zechariah Chafee, for example, evolved to provide a rationale for courts to act as a limited restraint on autocratic actions of the government. But Chester goes further, to examine an alternative theory: civil liberties exist as absolute rights, rather than being dependent on the specific circumstances of each case. Over the years, the debate about the right to dissent has intensified and become more necessary. This fascinating book explains why, a century after the First World War - and in the era of Trump - we need to know about this.…

Zustand: As New. Unread book in perfect condition.

Hardcover. Zustand: Brand New. 216 pages. 8.50x5.50x8.25 inches. In Stock.