William Whewell's views on the philosophy of science were dismissed as incoherent and eclectic when he introduced them in the middle of the 19th century, though some leading contemporaries engaged and even incorporated them. When his ideas were resurrected a century later, they were dismissed as poor induction rather than original thinking. Wettersten (philosophy of science, Mannheim U., Germany) explores why Whewell's impact continues to be felt, and why almost all theorists have had to come to terms with his ideas. He also addresses larger concerns such as whether traditions can be assessed rationally, and whether there is a logic to how they change or can be changed. Six commentaries follow his treatise, and he responds to them. Annotation ©2004 Book News, Inc., Portland, OR (booknews.com)
Die Inhaltsangabe kann sich auf eine andere Ausgabe dieses Titels beziehen.
Anbieter: Henry Hollander, Bookseller, Los Angeles, CA, USA
Hardbound. Zustand: Very Good. Octavo, glossy paper covered boards, 429 pp., index Edited by James A. Bell. Poznan Studies in the Philosophy of the Sciences and the Humanities, Volume 85, Monographs-in-Debate. Artikel-Nr. 100776
Anzahl: 1 verfügbar
Anbieter: Antiquariaat Schot, Hendrik-Ido-Ambacht, Niederlande
Original publisher's blue & white paper-covered boards, title spine and frontcover, large 8vo: 430pp., [6]pp., foreword, preface & acknowledgements, analytical table of contents, introduction, notes & references, commentaries, replies to commentaries by Wettersten, index. Very fine copy - as new. Volume 85: Poznan Studies in the Philosophy of the Sciences and the Humanities. Artikel-Nr. 153648
Anzahl: 2 verfügbar