In this book the authors present and, more importantly, give their own assessment of judicial decisions interpreting the Criminal Code provisions currently in force on self-defence and the transgression of its limits. The authors have critically verified the empirical material of 88 Supreme Court, 194 Court of Appeal and 34 District Court decisions in which an adjudicating body ruled on the merits with reference to the components and functions of self-defence or the transgression of its limits. The ultimate aim of this study is to answer the question if the present wording of relevant provisions is optimal, especially as judicial decisions are dominated by certain interpretative directions of these provisions that have an overwhelming impact on positions taken by courts in matters of detail. The present study, therefore, will not only reflect on legal dogmatics, by analysing the law as it stands now and the way it works in practice, but will also attempt to suggest amendments to the law.
Die Inhaltsangabe kann sich auf eine andere Ausgabe dieses Titels beziehen.
Łukasz Pohl is Professor and Head of the Department of Criminal Law at the University of Szczecin and leads the Section of Criminal Law and Process at the Institute of Justice. The focus of his academic interest is the fundamental issues of the general part of criminal law, and specifically the basic problems of criminology. Konrad Burdziak is Assistant Professor at the Department of Criminal Law at the University of Szczecin and works in the Section of Criminal Law and Process at the Institute of Justice. The general areas of his research interests include criminal law, criminal procedure and suicidology.
„Über diesen Titel“ kann sich auf eine andere Ausgabe dieses Titels beziehen.
Anbieter: PBShop.store UK, Fairford, GLOS, Vereinigtes Königreich
HRD. Zustand: New. New Book. Shipped from UK. Established seller since 2000. Artikel-Nr. CX-9783631764565
Anzahl: 15 verfügbar
Anbieter: PBShop.store US, Wood Dale, IL, USA
HRD. Zustand: New. New Book. Shipped from UK. Established seller since 2000. Artikel-Nr. CX-9783631764565
Anbieter: Ria Christie Collections, Uxbridge, Vereinigtes Königreich
Zustand: New. In. Artikel-Nr. ria9783631764565_new
Anzahl: Mehr als 20 verfügbar
Anbieter: Borkert, Schwarz und Zerfaß GbR, Berlin, Deutschland
Hardcover, 22 cm. Zustand: Wie neu. 136 pp. A perfect copy. - In this book the authors present and, more importantly, give their own assessment of judicial decisions interpreting the Criminal Code provisions currently in force on self-defence and the transgression of its limits. The authors have critically verified the empirical material of 88 Supreme Court, 194 Court of Appeal and 34 District Court decisions in which an adjudicating body ruled on the merits with reference to the components and functions of self-defence or the transgression of its limits. The ultimate aim of this study is to answer the question if the present wording of relevant provisions is optimal, especially as judicial decisions are dominated by certain interpretative directions of these provisions that have an overwhelming impact on positions taken by courts in matters of detail. The present study, therefore, will not only reflect on legal dogmatics, by analysing the law as it stands now and the way it works in practice, but will also attempt to suggest amendments to the law. Contents: 1: Scope and purpose of study -- 2: Self-defence -- 2.1 Assault on an interest protected by law -- 2.1.1 Assault as human behaviour (form of assault) -- 2.1.2 Unlawfulness of assault -- 2.1.3 Imminence of assault -- 2.2 Defence: resisting an assault -- 2.2.1 Defence as human behaviour (form of defence) -- 2.2.2 Defence as the commission of the actus reus of a prohibited act type -- 2.2.3 Defence as behaviour driven by the will to resist an assault -- 2.2.4 Necessity of defence: effectiveness, imperativeness and commensurateness -- 2.2.5 The range of interests protected by the right to self-defence -- 2.3 Substantive-law function of self-defence -- 3: Transgressing the limits of self-defence -- 3.1 Manners -- 3.1.1 Intensive excess -- 3.1.2 Extensive excess -- 3.2 Transgression of the limits of self-defence: personal aspects -- 3.3 Substantive-law consequences of a transgression of the limits of self-defence -- 4: Error as to self-defence -- 5: Judicial work methodology in cases involving self-defence. ISBN 9783631764565 Sprache: Englisch Gewicht in Gramm: 252. Artikel-Nr. 1156856
Anzahl: 1 verfügbar
Anbieter: Kennys Bookstore, Olney, MD, USA
Zustand: New. Artikel-Nr. V9783631764565
Anzahl: Mehr als 20 verfügbar
Anbieter: AHA-BUCH GmbH, Einbeck, Deutschland
Buch. Zustand: Neu. Druck auf Anfrage Neuware - Printed after ordering - In this book the authors present and, more importantly, give their own assessment of judicial decisions interpreting the Criminal Code provisions currently in force on self-defence and the transgression of its limits. The authors have critically verified the empirical material of 88 Supreme Court, 194 Court of Appeal and 34 District Court decisions in which an adjudicating body ruled on the merits with reference to the components and functions of self-defence or the transgression of its limits. The ultimate aim of this study is to answer the question if the present wording of relevant provisions is optimal, especially as judicial decisions are dominated by certain interpretative directions of these provisions that have an overwhelming impact on positions taken by courts in matters of detail. The present study, therefore, will not only reflect on legal dogmatics, by analysing the law as it stands now and the way it works in practice, but will also attempt to suggest amendments to the law. Artikel-Nr. 9783631764565
Anzahl: 1 verfügbar
Anbieter: Buchpark, Trebbin, Deutschland
Zustand: Hervorragend. Zustand: Hervorragend | Sprache: Englisch | Produktart: Bücher | In this book the authors present and, more importantly, give their own assessment of judicial decisions interpreting the Criminal Code provisions currently in force on self-defence and the transgression of its limits. The authors have critically verified the empirical material of 88 Supreme Court, 194 Court of Appeal and 34 District Court decisions in which an adjudicating body ruled on the merits with reference to the components and functions of self-defence or the transgression of its limits. The ultimate aim of this study is to answer the question if the present wording of relevant provisions is optimal, especially as judicial decisions are dominated by certain interpretative directions of these provisions that have an overwhelming impact on positions taken by courts in matters of detail. The present study, therefore, will not only reflect on legal dogmatics, by analysing the law as it stands now and the way it works in practice, but will also attempt to suggest amendments to the law. Artikel-Nr. 33352225/1
Anzahl: 2 verfügbar