Neuware -There are two prominent schools in linguistics: Minimalism (Chomsky) and Construction Grammar (Goldberg, Tomasello). Minimalism comes with the claim that our linguistic capabilities consist of an abstract, binary combinatorial operation (Merge) and a lexicon. Most versions of Construction Grammar assume that language consists of flat phrasal schemata that contribute their own meaning and may license additional arguments. This book examines a variant of Lexical Functional Grammar, which is lexical in principle but was augmented by tools that allow for the description of phrasal constructions in the Construction Grammar sense. These new tools include templates that can be used to model inheritance hierarchies and a resource driven semantics. The resource driven semantics makes it possible to reach the effects that lexical rules had, for example remapping of arguments, by semantic means. The semantic constraints can be evaluated in the syntactic component, which is basically similar to the delayed execution of lexical rules. So this is a new formalization that might be suitable to provide solutions to longstanding problems that are not available for other formalizations. While the authors suggest a lexical treatment of many phenomena and only assume phrasal constructions for selected phenomena like benefactive and resultative constructions in English, it can be shown that even these two constructions should not be treated phrasally in English and that the analysis would not extend to other languages as for instance German. I show that the new formal tools do not really improve the situation and many of the basic conceptual problems remain. Since this specific proposal fails for two constructions, it follows that proposals (in the same framework) that assume phrasal analyses for all constructions are not appropriate either. The conclusion is that lexical models are needed and this entails that the schemata that combine syntactic objects are rather abstract (as in Categorial Grammar, Minimalism, HPSG and standard LFG). On the other hand there are constructions that should be treated by very specific, phrasal schemata as in Construction Grammar and LFG and HPSG. So the conclusion is that both schools are right (and wrong) and that a combination of ideas from both camps is needed.Books on Demand GmbH, �berseering 33, 22297 Hamburg 104 pp. Englisch.

Bestandsnummer des Verk�ufers 9783961101221

Verk�ufer kontaktieren

Diesen Artikel melden

Bibliografische Details

Titel: A lexicalist account of argument structure
Verlag: Language Science Press, Language Science Press Okt 2018
Erscheinungsjahr: 2018
Sprache: Englisch
ISBN-10: 3961101221
ISBN-13: 9783961101221
Einband: Buch
Zustand: Neu

�ber diesen Titel

Inhaltsangabe

There are two prominent schools in linguistics: Minimalism (Chomsky) and Construction Grammar (Goldberg, Tomasello). Minimalism comes with the claim that our linguistic capabilities consist of an abstract, binary combinatorial operation (Merge) and a lexicon. Most versions of Construction Grammar assume that language consists of flat phrasal schemata that contribute their own meaning and may license additional arguments. This book examines a variant of Lexical Functional Grammar, which is lexical in principle but was augmented by tools that allow for the description of phrasal constructions in the Construction Grammar sense. These new tools include templates that can be used to model inheritance hierarchies and a resource driven semantics. The resource driven semantics makes it possible to reach the effects that lexical rules had, for example remapping of arguments, by semantic means. The semantic constraints can be evaluated in the syntactic component, which is basically similar to the delayed execution of lexical rules. So this is a new formalization that might be suitable to provide solutions to longstanding problems that are not available for other formalizations. While the authors suggest a lexical treatment of many phenomena and only assume phrasal constructions for selected phenomena like benefactive and resultative constructions in English, it can be shown that even these two constructions should not be treated phrasally in English and that the analysis would not extend to other languages as for instance German. I show that the new formal tools do not really improve the situation and many of the basic conceptual problems remain. Since this specific proposal fails for two constructions, it follows that proposals (in the same framework) that assume phrasal analyses for all constructions are not appropriate either. The conclusion is that lexical models are needed and this entails that the schemata that combine syntactic objects are rather abstract (as in Catego

��ber diesen Titel� kann sich auf eine andere Ausgabe dieses Titels beziehen.

Anbieterinformationen

Impressum Thorsten Retsch Buchversand Mimpf2000 Ober�lschnitz 16 95517 Emtmannsberg Deutschland Telefon: 09209-2023188 Email: mimpf2000@online.de USt-ID-Nr.: DE 235096871 Wir f�hren gebrauchte B�cher aus allen Sparten der Literatur

Zur Homepage des Verk�ufers

Unternehmensdaten des Verk�ufers

buchversandmimpf2000
Germany

Gesch�ftsbedingungen und Versandinformationen

Verkaufsbedingungen

Widerrufsbelehrung/ Muster-Widerrufsformular/
Allgemeine Gesch�ftsbedingungen und Kundeninformationen/ Datenschutzerkl�rung

Widerrufsrecht f�r Verbraucher
(Verbraucher ist jede nat�rliche Person, die ein Rechtsgesch�ft zu Zwecken abschlie�t, die �berwiegend weder ihrer gewerblichen noch ihrer selbstst�ndigen beruflichen T�tigkeit zugerechnet werden k�nnen.)

Widerrufsbelehrung

Widerrufsrecht
Sie haben das Recht, binnen 14 Tagen ohne Angabe von Gr�nden diesen Vertrag zu widerrufen.
Die Widerrufsfr...

Mehr Information

Versandbedingungen

Soweit in der Artikelbeschreibung keine andere Frist angegeben ist, erfolgt die Lieferung der Ware innerhalb von 3-5 Werktagen nach Vertragsschluss, bei Vorauszahlung erst nach Eingang des vollst�ndigen Kaufpreises und der Versandkosten. Alle Preise inkl. MwSt.

Impressum & Info zum Verk�ufer