birkhäuser basel springer basel nov 2012 (2 Ergebnisse)

Taschenbuch. Zustand: Neu. Neuware - 1. Historical Remarks Convex Integration theory, first introduced by M. Gromov [17], is one of three general methods in immersion-theoretic topology for solving a broad range of problems in geometry and topology. The other methods are: (i) Removal of Singularities, introduced by M. Gromov and Y. Eliashberg [8]; (ii) the covering homotopy method which, following M. Gromov's thesis [16], is also referred to as the method of sheaves. The covering homotopy method is due originally to S. Smale [36] who proved a crucial covering homotopy result in order to solve the classification problem for immersions of spheres in Euclidean space. These general methods are not linearly related in the sense that succes sive methods subsumed the previous methods. Each method has its own distinct foundation, based on an independent geometrical or analytical insight. Conse quently, each method has a range of applications to problems in topology that are best suited to its particular insight. For example, a distinguishing feature of Convex Integration theory is that it applies to solve closed relations in jet spaces, including certain general classes of underdetermined non-linear systems of par tial differential equations. As a case of interest, the Nash-Kuiper Cl-isometrie immersion theorem ean be reformulated and proved using Convex Integration theory (cf. Gromov [18]). No such results on closed relations in jet spaees can be proved by means of the other two methods.Springer Basel AG in Springer Science + Business Media, Heidelberger Platz 3, 14197 Berlin 228 pp. Englisch.

Taschenbuch. Zustand: Neu. Neuware -Eigenschaften von Singularitäten . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 49 4. 1 Der Umgebungsrand . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 49 4. 2 Gute Repräsentanten von Abbildungskeimen . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 60 4. 3 Monodromie . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 63 4. 4 Die Monodromie einer quadratischen Singularität (lokaler Fall) . . . . . . . . . . 65 5 Die U ntersuchung von Milnorfasern . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ¿. . . ¿. . ¿¿. ¿ ¿. . . . . . . 73 5. 1 Milnorfasem von ebenen Kurvensingularitäten . . . . . . ¿. . ¿. . . ¿. . ¿. . . . . . . . . 73 5. 2 Milnorfasem von Hyperfiä. chensingularitäten . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ¿. . ¿. . . . . . . . . . 81 6 Die Beec r hnung d er M o n oro d mie . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ¿. . . . . . ¿. . ¿ . . . . . . . . . 87 6. 1 Die Morsifikation . . . . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ¿. . . . . . . 87 6. 2 Die Monodromie der ebenen Kurvensingularitäten in Cl. . . . . . . . . . 88 6. 3 Dynkin-Dia. gramm und Monodromiegruppe . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 103 6. 4 Die Monodromie beim Addieren von FUnktionskeimen . . . . . . . . . . . . .Springer Basel AG in Springer Science + Business Media, Heidelberger Platz 3, 14197 Berlin 152 pp. Deutsch.