kuhn popper struggle soul science von fuller steve (6 Ergebnisse)

Zustand: Good. Former library book; may include library markings. Used book that is in clean, average condition without any missing pages.

Paperback. Zustand: Very Good. The book has been read, but is in excellent condition. Pages are intact and not marred by notes or highlighting. The spine remains undamaged.

Paperback. Zustand: Very Good. No Jacket. May have limited writing in cover pages. Pages are unmarked. ~ ThriftBooks: Read More, Spend Less 0.5.

Hardcover. Zustand: Gut. 228 p. Yellowed copy with rubbed and soiled dust jacket. The pages are browned but clean. Vergilbtes Exemplar mit beriebenem und verschmutztem Schutzumschlag. Die Seiten sind gebräunt, aber sauber. - Introduction - - Chapter 1: In Search of the Causes of a Non-Event - - Chapter 2: Kuhn and Popper: A Case of Mistaken Identities - - Chapter 3: Popperian Suspicions and Kuhnian Vindication - - Chapter 4: We've Been Here Before: The Prehistory of the Debate - - Chapter 5: Dialectics as the Pulse of Scientific Progress - - Chapter 6: A Parting Shot at the Misunderstanding - - Chapter 7: Why Philosophers Get No Respect from Scientists - - Chapter 8: So, Why Are Philosophers of Science Pro-Science? - - Chapter 9: The Return of the Repressed: Philosophers as Tory Historians of Science - - Chapter 10: The Religious Unconscious of the Debate - - Chapter 11: Do We Believe by Evidence or by Decision? A Very Short History of Epistemology. Sprache: Englisch Gewicht in Gramm: 250.

Buch. Zustand: Neu. Neuware - Thomas Kuhn's Structure of Scientific Revolutions has sold over a million copies in more than twenty languages and has remained one of the ten most cited academic works for the past half century. In contrast, Karl Popper's seminal book The Logic of Scientific Discovery has lapsed into relative obscurity. Although the two men debated the nature of science only once, the legacy of this encounter has dominated intellectual and public discussions on the topic ever since.

Zustand: New. Argues that not only has Kuhn s dominance had an adverse impact on the field but both thinkers have been radically misinterpreted in the process. This debate raises a question: Can science remain an independent, progressive force in society, or is it destin.