Sprache: Englisch
Verlag: John William Parker., London., 1841
Anbieter: Tony Hutchinson, Seale, Vereinigtes Königreich
Magazin / Zeitschrift Erstausgabe
EUR 53,59
Anzahl: 1 verfügbar
In den WarenkorbPaper Cover. Zustand: Very Good. First Edition. 8pp. 11 x 7 inch. An original complete edition of this weekly magazine. It is over 180 years old & may have light foxing or age discolouration. In the title line I have listed articles or pictures of specific interest in this issue. Most issues contain a mixture of general interest articles usually including visits to famous or exotic places, scientific, topographical, art, etc and some are illustrated with fine woodcuts. It has been disbound from a compilation and is therefore still unfolded and in nice clean condition - no deliberate marks. It will be despatched in a board back envelope.
Verlag: House of Commons, London, 1823
Anbieter: Boris Jardine Rare Books, Edinburgh, Vereinigtes Königreich
Erstausgabe
EUR 8.931,15
Anzahl: 1 verfügbar
In den WarenkorbSoft cover. Zustand: Near Fine. 1st Edition. Offprint in self-wraps, folio; pp. [8]. THE DIFFERENCE ENGINE GAINS THE SUPPORT OF DAVY, THE ROYAL SOCIETY, AND THE BRITISH GOVERNMENT. An exceptionally scarce and important document. This is the sole separate printing of the parliamentary record ('Sessional Papers') containing Babbage's celebrated letter to Humphry Davy, as well as the favourable response of the Royal Society. Only one other copy is recorded worldwide, at the University of Illinois; however, the present copy is the only known example to retain its original stab-stitching, i.e. to be offered in the pristine 'as issued' state. Although many calculating machines predate the Difference Engine, Babbage's machine marks a decisive break: Babbage wanted not only to mechanize calculation, but to automate it. Babbage's intention was to improve the compilation and printing of astronomical and other mathematical tables, which were of supreme importance - notably in navigation - and which Babbage and others had found to be riddled with errors. The present document marks the moment when Babbage's Difference Engine went from an inventor's dream to a reality - albeit one only ever partially completed. Having created a model of his Difference Engine in the early 1820s, Babbage sought public support, writing with extensive detail of the project to the most famous scientist in the land - Humphry Davy, then President of the Royal Society. With Davy's backing, the Royal Society's response was decisive: a grant to Babbage was made, and production began in earnest. Babbage's principal engineer was Joseph Clement, a highly skilled machinist responsible for constructing the intricate precision parts required. Over roughly a decade of active development, disagreements over costs, design changes, and workshop arrangements led to tensions between Babbage and Clement, eventually causing the project to stall by the early 1830s. Despite significant progress on components, the engine was never completed during Babbage's lifetime. Nevertheless, the Difference Engine marks a decisive moment in the history of computing. This was the machine that Ada Lovelace became fascinated by shortly after her first meeting with Babbage, and she visited Babbage many times in order to see it in action. Babbage's thinking on the Difference Engine developed through the 1820s and eventually he began to conceive of a general-purpose computing machine, the never-built Analytical Engine, also analysed and even 'programmed' by Lovelace. Nor was the Difference Engine itself a practical failure: a number of machines were made by others, notably Per Georg Scheutz and George B. Grant. Full contents of the present offprint: 1. Copy of a LETTER to Sir HUMPHRY DAVY, Bart. President of the Royal Society, &c. &c. on the application of Machinery to the purpose of Calculating and Printing Mathematical Tables; from CHARLES BABBAGE, Esq. M.A. F.R.S. Lond, and Edin. Member of the Cambridge Philosophical Society, Secretary of the Astronomical Society of London, and Correspondent of the Philomathic Society of Paris. 2. Copy of a LETTER from GEO. HARRISON, Esq. to Sir H. DAVY, Bart, transmitting to him a Printed Letter (of which No 1. is a copy) forwarded to the Lords of the Treasury by Mr. Babbage. 3. Copy of the REPORT of the ROYAL SOCIETY on the aforegoing Letter of Mr. Babbage. Near fine condition: stab-stitched as issued; docket title printed orthoganally to rear of last sheet; presented in an attractive custom-made folder with silk ties and a paper title to the cover.
Erscheinungsdatum: 1834
Anbieter: Henry Sotheran Ltd, London, Vereinigtes Königreich
EUR 1.071,74
Anzahl: 1 verfügbar
In den WarenkorbEdinburgh: Printed by Ballantyne and Company for Longman, Rees, Orme, Brown, Green, and Longman.1834. 8vo. 2 vols bound in one, nos. CXIX and CXX of The Edinburgh Review, April - July 1834. Half brown calf, marbled boards, gilt rules and lettering to spine, marbled; pp. ii,1-262; ii, 263-545 (Babbage on pp.263 - 327), diagrams to text; spine with vertical crack and recently repaired to front hinge, occasional foxing especially to first and last few leavesFirst edition of Volume 59 of The Edinburgh Review. Scarce. Dionysius Lardner's long article on the calculating machine, written with the guidance of Babbage, came after a series of successful lectures that he gave in Edinburgh. It takes the form of a review of seven articles on the machine, including Babbage's own papers of 1822 and the Royal Society's report of 1829. Lardner, editor of the 133-volume Cabinet Cyclopedia, was a well-known speaker and populariser of science, and his adoption of Babbage's cause seemed advantageous to the great mathematician.However, Lardner made a tactical error that meant that the machine did not receive the public funding Babbage sought. In order to make the subject palatable to a general audience, he concentrated on the machine's ability to correct errors in printed mathematical tables. While this was a valid view, and echoed Babbage's own 1822 papers which he wrote just as his project to build the machine was grinding to a halt, it also fatally underplayed the true mathematical potential of the engine to open up new avenues in computation. Lardner's presentation of the machine became the accepted interpretation, and one that was open to attack: "The utility of the Engines as a solution to table making was resoundingly rejected by experts in England and on the Continent: by George Biddell Airy in England, by Nils Selander in Sweden, and by Joseph Leverrier in France. By identifying the value of the Engines as the practical utility of eliminating errors in the production of tables, Lardner forced the Engine's advocates to defend the machine from a position of weakness" (Doron D. Swade, "Automatic Computation: Charles Babbage and Computational Method", The Rutherford Journal).Nevertheless, as a record of the workings of this wonderful machine in a manner intelligible to the general reader, and as a survey of Babbage's thought, this is still a crucial and fascinating paper.