Isbn: 9798189627910 - the intelligence ceiling: what actually limits ai — and the one question that decides how far machine minds can go (mental self-defense series) (1 Ergebnisse)

ISBN: 
Mit der Detailsuche verfeinern

Optimieren Sie Ihre Suche

  • Bücher (1)

  • Neu (1)

bis

Benutzerdefinierte Preisspanne (EUR)

bis

  • Sprache: Englisch

    Verlag: Amazon Digital Services LLC - Kdp Aug 2026, 2026

    9798189627910

    Serie: Buch 1 von 2 - Mental Self-Defense Series

    • Softcover

    Anbieter: AHA-BUCH GmbH, Einbeck, DeutschlandAHA-BUCH GmbH

    Verkäufer/-in mit 5 Sternen
    Verkäufer/-in kontaktieren

    Zustand: Neu

    EUR 24,83

    EUR 35,00 Versand 
    Versand von Deutschland nach USA

    Anzahl: 2 verfügbar

    Taschenbuch. Zustand: Neu. Neuware - Everyone is mapping what AI can do. Almost no one is mapping what it can't ->The Intelligence Ceiling is a field guide for leaders who have to makeconsequential bets on AI while the ground keeps shifting: founders, executives, investors, and the operators everyone turns to when a new modeldrops. It refuses both the hype and the panic. Instead, it draws the hardlines that will actually determine where machine intelligence stops, stalls, or surprises us - and shows you how to build a strategy on foundations that>The book maps four hard ceilings on AI and the one open question that sits>- The physical ceiling - the energy, thermodynamic, and infrastructure limitsno algorithm can outrun.- The computational ceiling - what complexity theory and the mathematics ofintelligence say scaling can and can't reach.- The economic ceiling - where value actually migrates as AI commoditizes, andwhy being an 'AI adopter' is not a durable advantage.- The governance ceiling - how the EU AI Act and the geopolitics of chips andenergy constrain what gets built, and by whom.- The open question - whether a machine can possess genuine agency orexperience, where quantum computing really fits, and why the honest answer is>What sets this book apart is calibration. Every claim is labeled: establishedscience, reasonable speculation, or the author's own defensible bet. It neverpretends an open question is closed. And it's written by an operator who worksinside the live AI economy and has spent two decades building high-performance>You won't finish it with certainty. You'll finish it with something moredurable: a first-principles way of thinking about machine intelligence thatholds up in a boardroom, a due-diligence call, or a strategy offsite - andthat makes you the most clear-eyed voice in the room, not the most enthusiasticor the most alarmed, but the most accurate.…