Isbn: 9789811654886 - developing university social responsibility: a business ethics approach to information disclosure in japan (3 Ergebnisse)

ISBN
Mit der Detailsuche verfeinern

Optimieren Sie Ihre Suche

  • Bücher (3)

  • Neu (3)

bis

Benutzerdefinierte Preisspanne (EUR)

bis

    • Sprache: Englisch

      Verlag: Springer, 2021

      9811654883 / 9789811654886

      • Hardcover

      Anbieter: Ria Christie Collections, Uxbridge, Vereinigtes KönigreichRia Christie Collections

      Verkäufer/-in mit 5 Sternen
      Verkäufer/-in kontaktieren

      Zustand: Neu

      EUR 140,96

      EUR 13,17 Versand 
      Versand von Vereinigtes Königreich nach USA

      Anzahl: Mehr als 20 verfügbar

      Zustand: New. In.

    • Sprache: Englisch

      Verlag: Springer, 2021

      9811654883 / 9789811654886

      • Hardcover

      Anbieter: Revaluation Books, Exeter, Vereinigtes KönigreichRevaluation Books

      Verkäufer/-in mit 5 Sternen
      Verkäufer/-in kontaktieren

      Zustand: Neu

      EUR 192,92

      EUR 11,66 Versand 
      Versand von Vereinigtes Königreich nach USA

      Anzahl: 2 verfügbar

      Hardcover. Zustand: Brand New. 177 pages. 9.25x6.10x0.63 inches. In Stock.

    • Sprache: Englisch

      Verlag: Springer, 2021

      9811654883 / 9789811654886

      • Hardcover

      Anbieter: AHA-BUCH GmbH, Einbeck, DeutschlandAHA-BUCH GmbH

      Verkäufer/-in mit 5 Sternen
      Verkäufer/-in kontaktieren

      Zustand: Neu

      EUR 193,88

      EUR 30,50 Versand 
      Versand von Deutschland nach USA

      Anzahl: 1 verfügbar

      Buch. Zustand: Neu. Druck auf Anfrage Neuware - Printed after ordering - This book analyzes the growing importance of information disclosure in Japanese universities in the context of the country's changing circumstances from both a macroscopic and microscopic perspective, with a focus on the concept of universities as organizations. This macroscopic analysis is based on available data concerning the various information disclosure practices of Japanese universities and includes a discussion of their strengths and weaknesses. As for the microscopic analysis, questionnaires and various other quantitative methods have been used to study overall satisfaction with the level of disclosure among students and teachers in public and private universities, including differences between Japanese and Chinese students. The results of these surveys have then been analyzed to identify the main factors informing students' views on the subject. Finally, additional insight into the practice of information disclosure in Japanese universitieshas been provided in a series of representative case studies, which should help promote further study concerning the practical applications of such disclosure. Based on the above analysis, this book proposes a social responsibility-based approach to university information disclosure, which incorporates stakeholder theory-based identification of public information content, an underlying focus on disclosure as a means to realize universities' social responsibilities, identification of the types of information that universities should seek to disclose, recommendations for developing a framework for the systematic disclosure of such information, and recent disclosure trends. As part of this approach, recommendations concerning the arrangement of different sources of information, thoughts on building a publicly accessible platform for sharing university information, and key points underlying the systematic disclosure of information within universities are also proposed.Finally, this book is helpful in identifying further areas of research, including but not necessarily limited to the ideas and legal principles underlying the construction of a university information disclosure system, the development of information disclosure systems based on social responsibility, and the development of various standards for the disclosure of information. The ideal approach would ensure that all stakeholders are provided with meaningful access to relevant information, and that transparency takes precedence over any competing considerations as part of an overriding effort to improve university administration and oversight.