Anbieter: Antiquariat Bookfarm, Löbnitz, Deutschland
Softcover. 385 S. Ehem. Bibliotheksexemplar mit Signatur und Stempel. GUTER Zustand, ein paar Gebrauchsspuren. Ex-library with stamp and library-signature. GOOD condition, some traces of use. L08381 9027710694 Sprache: Englisch Gewicht in Gramm: 690.
Verlag: D. Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht (Holl.), Boston (USA), London (UK), 1980
ISBN 10: 9027710694 ISBN 13: 9789027710697
Zustand: - keine Angabe -. 8° 385 pp.; Orig.-Leinen mit OU; 750g; [Englisch]; Umschlag beschmutzt, Rücken gebräunt; Anstreichungen/Anmerkungen mit Bleistift im Text // DJ used, brown, with pencil underlinings and remarks Selected papers of the 1st Guy L. Leonhard Memorial Conference in Philosophy, University of Nevada, Reno, 1978 _ xXx_. BUCH.
Buch. Zustand: Neu. Druck auf Anfrage Neuware - Printed after ordering - It is fast becoming a cliche that scientific discovery is being rediscovered. For two philosophical generations (that of the Founders and that of the Followers of the logical positivist and logical empiricist movements), discovery had been consigned to the domain of the intractable, the ineffable, the inscrutable. The philosophy of science was focused on the so-called context of justification as its proper domain. More recently, as the exclusivity of the logical reconstruc tion program in philosophy of science came under question, and as the critique of justification developed within the framework of logical and epistemological analysis, the old question of scientific discovery, which had been put on the back burner, began to emerge once again. Emphasis on the relation of the history of science to the philosophy of science, and attention to the question of theory change and theory replacement, also served to legitimate a new concern with the origins of scientific change to be found within discovery and invention. How welcome then to see what a wide range of issues and what a broad representation of philosophers and historians of science have been brought together in the present two volumes of the Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science! For what these volumes achieve, in effect, is the continuation of a tradition which had once been strong in the philosophy of science - namely, that tradition which addressed the question of scientific discovery as a central question in the understanding of science.