Sprache: Englisch
Verlag: New York University Press, 2017
ISBN 10: 1479846031 ISBN 13: 9781479846030
Anbieter: Anybook.com, Lincoln, Vereinigtes Königreich
EUR 9,16
Anzahl: 1 verfügbar
In den WarenkorbZustand: Good. This is an ex-library book and may have the usual library/used-book markings inside.This book has hardback covers. Clean from markings. In good all round condition. Dust jacket in good condition. Please note the Image in this listing is a stock photo and may not match the covers of the actual item,500grams, ISBN:9781479846030.
Anbieter: PBShop.store UK, Fairford, GLOS, Vereinigtes Königreich
EUR 35,41
Anzahl: 3 verfügbar
In den WarenkorbHRD. Zustand: New. New Book. Shipped from UK. Established seller since 2000.
Anbieter: Majestic Books, Hounslow, Vereinigtes Königreich
EUR 38,68
Anzahl: 3 verfügbar
In den WarenkorbZustand: New. pp. 224.
Anbieter: Ria Christie Collections, Uxbridge, Vereinigtes Königreich
EUR 41,40
Anzahl: Mehr als 20 verfügbar
In den WarenkorbZustand: New. In.
Sprache: Englisch
Verlag: New York University Press, 2017
ISBN 10: 1479846031 ISBN 13: 9781479846030
Anbieter: Kennys Bookstore, Olney, MD, USA
Zustand: New. Series: Legal Latin in Practice. Num Pages: 224 pages. BIC Classification: LNDC. Category: (G) General (US: Trade). Dimension: 5334 x 3556. . . 2017. Hardback. . . . . Books ship from the US and Ireland.
Anbieter: Revaluation Books, Exeter, Vereinigtes Königreich
EUR 52,19
Anzahl: 2 verfügbar
In den WarenkorbHardcover. Zustand: Brand New. 224 pages. 8.50x5.75x0.75 inches. In Stock.
EUR 41,45
Anzahl: Mehr als 20 verfügbar
In den WarenkorbZustand: New. Über den AutorWilliam D. AraizaKlappentextAn introduction to the legal concept of unconstitutional bias.If a town council denies a zoning permit for a group home for intellectually.
Sprache: Englisch
Verlag: New York University Press Apr 2017, 2017
ISBN 10: 1479846031 ISBN 13: 9781479846030
Anbieter: AHA-BUCH GmbH, Einbeck, Deutschland
Buch. Zustand: Neu. Neuware - An introduction to the legal concept of unconstitutional bias. If a town council denies a zoning permit for a group home for intellectually disabled persons because residents don't want 'those kinds of people' in the neighborhood, the town's decision is motivated by the public's dislike of a particular group. Constitutional law calls this rationale 'animus.' Over the last two decades, the Supreme Court has increasingly turned to the concept of animus to explain why some instances of discrimination are unconstitutional. However, the Court's condemnation of animus fails to address some serious questions. How can animus on the part of people and institutions be uncovered Does mere opposition to a particular group's equality claims constitute animus Does the concept of animus have roots in the Constitution Animus engages these important questions, offering an original and provocative introduction to this type of unconstitutional bias. William Araiza analyzes some of the modern Supreme Court's most important discrimination cases through the lens of animus, tracing the concept from nineteenth century legal doctrine to today's landmark cases, including Obergefell vs. Hodges and United States v. Windsor, both related to the legal rights of same-sex couples. Animus humanizes what might otherwise be an abstract legal question, illustrating what constitutes animus, and why the prohibition against it matters more today than ever in our pluralistic society.