Sprache: Englisch
Verlag: Cambridge University Press, 2018
ISBN 10: 1316645398 ISBN 13: 9781316645390
Anbieter: Books From California, Simi Valley, CA, USA
Paperback. Zustand: Good. Cover and edges may have some wear.
Sprache: Englisch
Verlag: Cambridge University Press, 2018
ISBN 10: 1316645398 ISBN 13: 9781316645390
Anbieter: Majestic Books, Hounslow, Vereinigtes Königreich
EUR 29,43
Anzahl: 1 verfügbar
In den WarenkorbZustand: New.
Sprache: Englisch
Verlag: Cambridge University Press, 2018
ISBN 10: 1316645398 ISBN 13: 9781316645390
Anbieter: Romtrade Corp., STERLING HEIGHTS, MI, USA
Zustand: New. This is a Brand-new US Edition. This Item may be shipped from US or any other country as we have multiple locations worldwide.
Sprache: Englisch
Verlag: Cambridge University Press, 2018
ISBN 10: 1316645398 ISBN 13: 9781316645390
Anbieter: Ria Christie Collections, Uxbridge, Vereinigtes Königreich
EUR 42,32
Anzahl: Mehr als 20 verfügbar
In den WarenkorbZustand: New. In.
EUR 59,67
Anzahl: 2 verfügbar
In den WarenkorbPaperback. Zustand: Brand New. 250 pages. 9.00x6.00x0.75 inches. In Stock.
Sprache: Englisch
Verlag: Cambridge University Press, 2018
ISBN 10: 1316645398 ISBN 13: 9781316645390
Anbieter: Kennys Bookstore, Olney, MD, USA
Zustand: New. 2018. Paperback. . . . . . Books ship from the US and Ireland.
Sprache: Englisch
Verlag: Cambridge University Press, 2018
ISBN 10: 1316645398 ISBN 13: 9781316645390
Anbieter: AHA-BUCH GmbH, Einbeck, Deutschland
Taschenbuch. Zustand: Neu. Druck auf Anfrage Neuware - Printed after ordering - The age-old debate about what constitutes just punishment has become deadlocked. Retributivists continue to privilege desert over all else, and consequentialists continue to privilege punishment's expected positive consequences, such as deterrence or rehabilitation, over all else. In this important intervention into the debate, Leo Zaibert argues that despite some obvious differences, these traditional positions are structurally very similar, and that the deadlock between them stems from the fact they both oversimplify the problem of punishment. Proponents of these positions pay insufficient attention to the conflicts of values that punishment, even when justified, generates. Mobilizing recent developments in moral philosophy, Zaibert offers a properly pluralistic justification of punishment that is necessarily more complex than its traditional counterparts. An understanding of this complexity should promote a more cautious approach to inflicting punishment on individual wrongdoers and to developing punitive policies and institutions.