Sprache: Englisch
Verlag: Cambridge University Press, 2019
ISBN 10: 1108722911 ISBN 13: 9781108722919
Anbieter: Romtrade Corp., STERLING HEIGHTS, MI, USA
Zustand: New. This is a Brand-new US Edition. This Item may be shipped from US or any other country as we have multiple locations worldwide.
Sprache: Englisch
Verlag: Cambridge University Press, 2019
ISBN 10: 1108722911 ISBN 13: 9781108722919
Anbieter: Majestic Books, Hounslow, Vereinigtes Königreich
EUR 38,58
Anzahl: 1 verfügbar
In den WarenkorbZustand: New. pp. 410.
Sprache: Englisch
Verlag: Cambridge University Press, 2019
ISBN 10: 1108722911 ISBN 13: 9781108722919
Anbieter: Ria Christie Collections, Uxbridge, Vereinigtes Königreich
EUR 47,12
Anzahl: Mehr als 20 verfügbar
In den WarenkorbZustand: New. In.
Sprache: Englisch
Verlag: Cambridge University Press, 2019
ISBN 10: 1108722911 ISBN 13: 9781108722919
Anbieter: Kennys Bookstore, Olney, MD, USA
Zustand: New. 2019. paperback. . . . . . Books ship from the US and Ireland.
Sprache: Englisch
Verlag: Cambridge University Press, 2019
ISBN 10: 1108722911 ISBN 13: 9781108722919
Anbieter: AHA-BUCH GmbH, Einbeck, Deutschland
Taschenbuch. Zustand: Neu. Druck auf Anfrage Neuware - Printed after ordering - The standard account of the First Amendment presupposes that the Supreme Court has consistently expanded the scope of free speech rights over time. This account holds true in some areas, but not in others. In this illuminating work, Ronald J. Krotoszynski, Jr acknowledges that the contemporary Supreme Court rigorously enforces the rules against content and viewpoint discrimination for those who possess the wherewithal to speak but when citizens need the government's assistance to speak - for example, access to public property for protest - free speech rights have declined. Instead of using open-ended balancing tests, the Roberts and Rehnquist Courts have opted for bright line, categorical rules that minimize judicial discretion. Opportunities for democratic engagement could be enhanced, however, if the federal courts returned to the Warren Court's balancing approach and vested federal judges with discretionary authority to require government to assist would-be speakers. This book should be read by anyone concerned with free speech and its place in democratic self-government.