Sprache: Englisch
Verlag: Cambridge University Press, 2019
ISBN 10: 1108473385 ISBN 13: 9781108473385
Anbieter: Prior Books Ltd, Cheltenham, Vereinigtes Königreich
Erstausgabe
EUR 35,68
Anzahl: 2 verfügbar
In den WarenkorbHardcover. Zustand: Like New. First Edition. Firm, square and tight with sturdy hinges, just showing a few minor rubs and some mild cosmetic wear. Hence a non-text page is stamped 'damaged'. Despite such this book is in nearly new condition. Thus the contents are crisp, fresh and clean. Offered for sale at a very sensible price.
Sprache: Englisch
Verlag: Cambridge University Press, 2019
ISBN 10: 1108473385 ISBN 13: 9781108473385
Anbieter: Majestic Books, Hounslow, Vereinigtes Königreich
EUR 112,91
Anzahl: 1 verfügbar
In den WarenkorbZustand: New. pp. 358.
Sprache: Englisch
Verlag: Cambridge University Press, 2019
ISBN 10: 1108473385 ISBN 13: 9781108473385
Anbieter: Ria Christie Collections, Uxbridge, Vereinigtes Königreich
EUR 144,56
Anzahl: Mehr als 20 verfügbar
In den WarenkorbZustand: New. In.
Sprache: Englisch
Verlag: Cambridge University Press, 2019
ISBN 10: 1108473385 ISBN 13: 9781108473385
Anbieter: Kennys Bookstore, Olney, MD, USA
EUR 208,05
Anzahl: Mehr als 20 verfügbar
In den WarenkorbZustand: New. 2019. Hardcover. . . . . . Books ship from the US and Ireland.
Anbieter: Revaluation Books, Exeter, Vereinigtes Königreich
EUR 214,49
Anzahl: 2 verfügbar
In den WarenkorbHardcover. Zustand: Brand New. 342 pages. 9.25x6.25x1.00 inches. In Stock.
Sprache: Englisch
Verlag: Cambridge University Press, 2019
ISBN 10: 1108473385 ISBN 13: 9781108473385
Anbieter: AHA-BUCH GmbH, Einbeck, Deutschland
Buch. Zustand: Neu. Druck auf Anfrage Neuware - Printed after ordering - This book advances the idea that in order to address some of the criticisms against investor-state dispute settlement, a large majority of states have taken a 'normative' strategy, negotiating or amending investment treaties with provisions that potentially give more control and greater involvement to the contracting parties, and notably the home state. This is particularly true of agreements concluded in the past fifteen years. At the same time, there is a potential revival of the 'remnants' of diplomatic protection that are embedded in investment treaties since the beginning of the system. But why is the home state being brought back into a domain from which it was expressly excluded several decades ago Why would a home state be interested in intervening in these conflicts Is this 'new' role of the home state in foreign investment disputes a 'return' to diplomatic protection of its nationals, or are we witnessing something different.