Isbn: 9781107672062 - control as movement (cambridge studies in linguistics, 126, band 126) (3 Ergebnisse)

Sprache: Englisch
Verlag: Cambridge University Press, 2014
- Softcover
Anbieter: Ria Christie Collections, Uxbridge, Vereinigtes KönigreichRia Christie Collections
Verkäufer/-in kontaktierenVerkäufer/-in mit 5 SternenZustand: Neu
EUR 52,16
EUR 10,89 VersandVersand von Vereinigtes Königreich nach USAAnzahl: Mehr als 20 verfügbar
Zustand: New. In English.

Sprache: Englisch
Verlag: Cambridge University Press, 2014
- Softcover
Anbieter: Kennys Bookstore, Olney, MD, USAKennys Bookstore
Verkäufer/-in kontaktierenVerkäufer/-in mit 5 SternenZustand: Neu
EUR 64,66
EUR 9,23 VersandVersand innerhalb von USAAnzahl: Mehr als 20 verfügbar
Zustand: New. Presents the main arguments for and against the Movement Theory of Control. Series: Cambridge Studies in Linguistics. Num Pages: 274 pages, black & white illustrations. BIC Classification: CFK. Category: (P) Professional & Vocational. Dimension: 230 x 152 x 15. Weight in Grams: 376. . 2014. Reprint. paperback. . . . . Books ship from the US and Ireland. …

Sprache: Englisch
Verlag: Cambridge University Press, 2014
- Softcover
Anbieter: AHA-BUCH GmbH, Einbeck, DeutschlandAHA-BUCH GmbH
Verkäufer/-in kontaktierenVerkäufer/-in mit 5 SternenZustand: Neu
EUR 78,24
EUR 35,00 VersandVersand von Deutschland nach USAAnzahl: 1 verfügbar
Taschenbuch. Zustand: Neu. Druck auf Anfrage Neuware - Printed after ordering - The Movement Theory of Control (MTC) makes one major claim: that control relations in sentences like 'John wants to leave' are grammatically mediated by movement. This goes against the traditional view that such sentences involve not movement, but binding, and analogizes control to raising, albeit with one important distinction: whereas the target of movement in control structures is a theta position, in raising it is a non-theta position; however the grammatical procedures underlying the two constructions are the same. This book presents the main arguments for MTC and shows it to have many theoretical advantages, the biggest being that it reduces the kinds of grammatical operations that the grammar allows, an important advantage in a minimalist setting. It also addresses the main arguments against MTC, using examples from control shift, adjunct control, and the control structure of 'promise', showing MTC to be conceptually, theoretically, and empirically superior to other approaches.…