Sprache: Englisch
Verlag: Cambridge University Press, 2014
ISBN 10: 1107660351 ISBN 13: 9781107660359
Anbieter: Ria Christie Collections, Uxbridge, Vereinigtes Königreich
EUR 44,69
Anzahl: Mehr als 20 verfügbar
In den WarenkorbZustand: New. In.
Sprache: Englisch
Verlag: Cambridge University Press, 2014
ISBN 10: 1107660351 ISBN 13: 9781107660359
Anbieter: Kennys Bookstore, Olney, MD, USA
Zustand: New. Gerard Conway explains how judges of the ECJ should be understood as sharing the same interpretative perspective as the law-maker. Series: Cambridge Studies in European Law and Policy. Num Pages: 346 pages, black & white illustrations. BIC Classification: 1QFE; JPSN2; LNAA. Category: (P) Professional & Vocational. Dimension: 230 x 152 x 18. Weight in Grams: 458. . 2014. paperback. . . . . Books ship from the US and Ireland.
Sprache: Englisch
Verlag: Cambridge University Press, 2014
ISBN 10: 1107660351 ISBN 13: 9781107660359
Anbieter: Revaluation Books, Exeter, Vereinigtes Königreich
EUR 64,66
Anzahl: 2 verfügbar
In den WarenkorbPaperback. Zustand: Brand New. 346 pages. 9.00x6.00x0.78 inches. In Stock.
Sprache: Englisch
Verlag: Cambridge University Press, 2014
ISBN 10: 1107660351 ISBN 13: 9781107660359
Anbieter: AHA-BUCH GmbH, Einbeck, Deutschland
Taschenbuch. Zustand: Neu. Druck auf Anfrage Neuware - Printed after ordering - The European Court of Justice is widely acknowledged to have played a fundamental role in developing the constitutional law of the EU, having been the first to establish such key doctrines as direct effect, supremacy and parallelism in external relations. Traditionally, EU scholarship has praised the role of the ECJ, with more critical perspectives being given little voice in mainstream EU studies. From the standpoint of legal reasoning, Gerard Conway offers the first sustained critical assessment of how the ECJ engages in its function and offers a new argument as to how it should engage in legal reasoning. He also explains how different approaches to legal reasoning can fundamentally change the outcome of case law and how the constitutional values of the EU justify a different approach to the dominant method of the ECJ.