Sprache: Englisch
Verlag: Cambridge University Press, 2013
ISBN 10: 1107646707 ISBN 13: 9781107646704
Zustand: Very Good. Very Good condition. A copy that may have a few cosmetic defects. May also contain light spine creasing or a few markings such as an owner's name, short gifter's inscription or light stamp.
Sprache: Englisch
Verlag: Cambridge University Press, 2013
ISBN 10: 1107646707 ISBN 13: 9781107646704
Anbieter: Ria Christie Collections, Uxbridge, Vereinigtes Königreich
EUR 44,30
Anzahl: Mehr als 20 verfügbar
In den WarenkorbZustand: New. In.
Sprache: Englisch
Verlag: Cambridge University Press, 2013
ISBN 10: 1107646707 ISBN 13: 9781107646704
Anbieter: Kennys Bookstore, Olney, MD, USA
Zustand: New. Leading scholars from across the social sciences present empirical evidence that the obstacle of regulatory capture is more surmountable than previously thought. Editor(s): Carpenter, Daniel; Moss, David A. Num Pages: 530 pages, 18 b/w illus. 23 tables. BIC Classification: JPB; JPP. Category: (P) Professional & Vocational; (U) Tertiary Education (US: College). Dimension: 151 x 226 x 29. Weight in Grams: 716. . 2013. Paperback. . . . . Books ship from the US and Ireland.
Anbieter: Revaluation Books, Exeter, Vereinigtes Königreich
EUR 62,83
Anzahl: 2 verfügbar
In den WarenkorbPaperback. Zustand: Brand New. 501 pages. 8.75x6.00x1.25 inches. In Stock.
Sprache: Englisch
Verlag: Cambridge University Press, 2013
ISBN 10: 1107646707 ISBN 13: 9781107646704
Anbieter: AHA-BUCH GmbH, Einbeck, Deutschland
Taschenbuch. Zustand: Neu. Druck auf Anfrage Neuware - Printed after ordering - When regulations (or lack thereof) seem to detract from the common good, critics often point to regulatory capture as a culprit. In some academic and policy circles it seems to have assumed the status of an immutable law. Yet for all the ink spilled describing and decrying capture, the concept remains difficult to nail down in practice. Is capture truly as powerful and unpreventable as the informed consensus seems to suggest This edited volume brings together seventeen scholars from across the social sciences to address this question. Their work shows that capture is often misdiagnosed and may in fact be preventable and manageable. Focusing on the goal of prevention, the volume advances a more rigorous and empirical standard for diagnosing and measuring capture, paving the way for new lines of academic inquiry and more precise and nuanced reform.