Sprache: Englisch
Verlag: Cambridge University Press, 2017
ISBN 10: 110755201X ISBN 13: 9781107552012
Zustand: As New. Like New condition. A near perfect copy that may have very minor cosmetic defects.
Sprache: Englisch
Verlag: Cambridge University Press, 2017
ISBN 10: 110755201X ISBN 13: 9781107552012
Anbieter: Ria Christie Collections, Uxbridge, Vereinigtes Königreich
EUR 44,26
Anzahl: Mehr als 20 verfügbar
In den WarenkorbZustand: New. In.
Sprache: Englisch
Verlag: Cambridge University Press, 2017
ISBN 10: 110755201X ISBN 13: 9781107552012
Anbieter: Kennys Bookstore, Olney, MD, USA
Zustand: New. This book examines how developing countries often sign up to highly potent rules underwriting economic globalisation without even realising it. Num Pages: 263 pages, 15 b/w illus. 15 tables. BIC Classification: JFFS; JPS; KCL; KCLT; KCP; LBBM. Category: (P) Professional & Vocational. Dimension: 229 x 152. . . 2017. Paperback. . . . . Books ship from the US and Ireland.
Sprache: Englisch
Verlag: Cambridge University Press, 2017
ISBN 10: 110755201X ISBN 13: 9781107552012
Anbieter: Revaluation Books, Exeter, Vereinigtes Königreich
EUR 63,73
Anzahl: 2 verfügbar
In den WarenkorbPaperback. Zustand: Brand New. reprint edition. 263 pages. 8.98x5.98x0.71 inches. In Stock.
Sprache: Englisch
Verlag: Cambridge University Press, 2017
ISBN 10: 110755201X ISBN 13: 9781107552012
Anbieter: AHA-BUCH GmbH, Einbeck, Deutschland
Taschenbuch. Zustand: Neu. Druck auf Anfrage Neuware - Printed after ordering - Modern investment treaties give private arbitrators power to determine whether governments should pay compensation to foreign investors for a wide range of sovereign acts. In recent years, particularly developing countries have incurred significant liabilities from investment treaty arbitration, which begs the question why they signed the treaties in the first place. Through a comprehensive and timely analysis, this book shows that governments in developing countries typically overestimated the economic benefits of investment treaties and practically ignored their risks. Rooted in insights on bounded rationality from behavioural psychology and economics, the analysis highlights how policy-makers often relied on inferential shortcuts when assessing the implications of the treaties, which resulted in systematic deviations from fully rational behaviour. This not only sheds new light on one of the most controversial legal regimes underwriting economic globalization but also provides a novel theoretical account of the often irrational, yet predictable, nature of economic diplomacy.