Sprache: Englisch
Verlag: Cambridge University Press, 2016
ISBN 10: 110714678X ISBN 13: 9781107146785
Anbieter: Ria Christie Collections, Uxbridge, Vereinigtes Königreich
EUR 120,41
Anzahl: Mehr als 20 verfügbar
In den WarenkorbZustand: New. In.
Sprache: Englisch
Verlag: Cambridge University Press, 2016
ISBN 10: 110714678X ISBN 13: 9781107146785
Anbieter: Kennys Bookstore, Olney, MD, USA
EUR 169,04
Anzahl: Mehr als 20 verfügbar
In den WarenkorbZustand: New. Providing an empirically grounded perspective on policy disagreements, Eric Montpetit highlights significant distortions in the media coverage of policy-making. Series: Cambridge Studies in Comparative Public Policy. Num Pages: 220 pages, 13 b/w illus. BIC Classification: JPA; JPB. Category: (P) Professional & Vocational; (U) Tertiary Education (US: College). Dimension: 238 x 159 x 21. Weight in Grams: 466. . 2016. Hardback. . . . . Books ship from the US and Ireland.
Anbieter: Revaluation Books, Exeter, Vereinigtes Königreich
EUR 173,93
Anzahl: 2 verfügbar
In den WarenkorbHardcover. Zustand: Brand New. 180 pages. 9.00x6.25x0.75 inches. In Stock.
Sprache: Englisch
Verlag: Cambridge University Press, 2016
ISBN 10: 110714678X ISBN 13: 9781107146785
Anbieter: AHA-BUCH GmbH, Einbeck, Deutschland
Buch. Zustand: Neu. Druck auf Anfrage Neuware - Printed after ordering - The work of early pluralist thinkers, from Arthur Bentley to Robert Dahl, inspired much optimism about democracy. They argued that democracy was functioning well, despite disagreements arising among the diversity of interests represented in policy-making processes. Yet it is unlikely that anyone paying attention to news coverage today would share such optimism. The media portray current policy-making processes as intractably polarized, devoid of any opportunity to move forward and adopt essential policy changes. This book aims to revive our long-lost sense of optimism about policy-making and democracy. Through original research into biotechnology policy-making in North America and Europe, Éric Montpetit shows that the depiction of policy-making offered by early pluralist thinkers is not so far off the present reality. Today's policy decision-making process - complete with disagreement among the participants - is consistent with what might be expected in a pluralist society, in sharp contrast with the negative image projected by the media.