Sprache: Englisch
Verlag: Cambridge University Press, 2014
ISBN 10: 1107065720 ISBN 13: 9781107065727
Anbieter: Ria Christie Collections, Uxbridge, Vereinigtes Königreich
EUR 132,81
Anzahl: Mehr als 20 verfügbar
In den WarenkorbZustand: New. In.
Sprache: Englisch
Verlag: Cambridge University Press, 2014
ISBN 10: 1107065720 ISBN 13: 9781107065727
Anbieter: Kennys Bookstore, Olney, MD, USA
EUR 187,82
Anzahl: Mehr als 20 verfügbar
In den WarenkorbZustand: New. A theory of international courts that assumes member states can ignore international agreements and adverse rulings and that the court does not have informational advantages. Series: Comparative Constitutional Law and Policy. Num Pages: 252 pages, 27 b/w illus. 18 tables. BIC Classification: 1QFE; LAM; LBHG; LND. Category: (P) Professional & Vocational. Dimension: 236 x 159 x 18. Weight in Grams: 480. . 2014. Illustrated. hardcover. . . . . Books ship from the US and Ireland.
Anbieter: Revaluation Books, Exeter, Vereinigtes Königreich
EUR 190,12
Anzahl: 2 verfügbar
In den WarenkorbHardcover. Zustand: Brand New. 243 pages. 9.25x6.25x0.75 inches. In Stock.
Sprache: Englisch
Verlag: Cambridge University Press, 2014
ISBN 10: 1107065720 ISBN 13: 9781107065727
Anbieter: AHA-BUCH GmbH, Einbeck, Deutschland
Buch. Zustand: Neu. Druck auf Anfrage Neuware - Printed after ordering - Nations often turn to international courts to help with overcoming collective-action problems associated with international relations. However, these courts generally cannot enforce their rulings, which begs the question: how effective are international courts This book proposes a general theory of international courts that assumes a court has no direct power over national governments. Member states are free to ignore both the international agreement and the rulings by the court created to enforce that agreement. The theory demonstrates that such a court can, in fact, facilitate cooperation with international law, but only within important political constraints. The authors examine the theoretical argument in the context of the European Union. Using an original data set of rulings by the European Court of Justice, they find that the disposition of court rulings and government compliance with those rulings comport with the theory's predictions.