Sprache: Englisch
Verlag: Cambridge University Press, 2016
ISBN 10: 110702174X ISBN 13: 9781107021747
Anbieter: Ria Christie Collections, Uxbridge, Vereinigtes Königreich
EUR 176,42
Anzahl: Mehr als 20 verfügbar
In den WarenkorbZustand: New. In.
Sprache: Englisch
Verlag: Cambridge University Press, 2016
ISBN 10: 110702174X ISBN 13: 9781107021747
Anbieter: Kennys Bookstore, Olney, MD, USA
EUR 254,44
Anzahl: Mehr als 20 verfügbar
In den WarenkorbZustand: New. This book examines the current legal status of the international genetic information commons and proposes alternative management strategies. Num Pages: 678 pages, 3 b/w illus. 21 tables. BIC Classification: LNR; PSAK. Category: (UP) Postgraduate, Research & Scholarly. Dimension: 161 x 236 x 42. Weight in Grams: 1106. . 2016. Hardback. . . . . Books ship from the US and Ireland.
Anbieter: Revaluation Books, Exeter, Vereinigtes Königreich
EUR 267,82
Anzahl: 2 verfügbar
In den WarenkorbHardcover. Zustand: Brand New. 650 pages. 9.25x6.25x1.75 inches. In Stock.
Sprache: Englisch
Verlag: Cambridge University Press, 2016
ISBN 10: 110702174X ISBN 13: 9781107021747
Anbieter: AHA-BUCH GmbH, Einbeck, Deutschland
Buch. Zustand: Neu. Druck auf Anfrage Neuware - Printed after ordering - The free exchange of microbial genetic information is an established public good, facilitating research on medicines, agriculture, and climate change. However, over the past quarter-century, access to genetic resources has been hindered by intellectual property claims from developed countries under the World Trade Organization's TRIPS Agreement (1994) and by claims of sovereign rights from developing countries under the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) (1992). In this volume, the authors examine the scientific community's responses to these obstacles and advise policymakers on how to harness provisions of the Nagoya Protocol (2010) that allow multilateral measures to support research. By pooling microbial materials, data, and literature in a carefully designed transnational e-infrastructure, the scientific community can facilitate access to essential research assets while simultaneously reinforcing the open access movement. The original empirical surveys of responses to the CBD included here provide a valuable addition to the literature on governing scientific knowledge commons.