Anbieter: Ria Christie Collections, Uxbridge, Vereinigtes Königreich
EUR 24,45
Anzahl: Mehr als 20 verfügbar
In den WarenkorbZustand: New. In.
Anbieter: Anybook.com, Lincoln, Vereinigtes Königreich
EUR 33,65
Anzahl: 1 verfügbar
In den WarenkorbZustand: Fair. This is an ex-library book and may have the usual library/used-book markings inside.This book has soft covers. In fair condition, suitable as a study copy. Please note the Image in this listing is a stock photo and may not match the covers of the actual item,200grams, ISBN:9780984216543.
EUR 21,46
Anzahl: Mehr als 20 verfügbar
In den WarenkorbZustand: New. KlappentextDrawing upon their own groundbreaking research, the authors demonstrate that major assumptions about science influence how forensic DNA evidence is interpreted by police officers, lawyers, forensic scientists, and jurors.
Anbieter: AHA-BUCH GmbH, Einbeck, Deutschland
Taschenbuch. Zustand: Neu. Neuware - When juries hear forensic DNA evidence presented in court, what does it mean to them And does it mean the same for police officers, lawyers and forensic scientists If jurors, scientists and others have fundamentally different understandings of DNA evidence, what are the implications for criminal justice This original book asks and answers these challenging questions. Drawing upon their own ground-breaking research, the authors demonstrate that major assumptions about science influence how forensic DNA evidence is interpreted. Forensic scientists appreciate that there is always an element of uncertainty involved in the production of scientific evidence, but this comes as a rude awakening to most jurors who have their faith in the certainty of science undermined. As a result, jurors can become confused and make errors-sometimes overrating and sometimes underrating the value of DNA evidence when deciding on guilt or innocence. This clearly has significance for the role of such evidence in criminal justice. While some people working in the criminal justice system would prefer scientists to hide uncertainty, the authors of this book mount a robust case for both juries and lawyers becoming better informed about the inevitable uncertainties of science.