Sprache: Englisch
Verlag: MD - Duke University Press, 2005
ISBN 10: 082233612X ISBN 13: 9780822336129
Anbieter: PBShop.store UK, Fairford, GLOS, Vereinigtes Königreich
EUR 34,79
Anzahl: 1 verfügbar
In den WarenkorbPAP. Zustand: New. New Book. Shipped from UK. Established seller since 2000.
Zustand: New. Essays contest the notion of the absolute preeminence of judicial review in constitutional interpretation, analyzing the role of Congress as a constitutional interpreter and responsible constitutional agent Editor(s): Devins, Neal E.; Whittington, Keith E. Series: Constitutional conflicts. Num Pages: 336 pages, 12 tables, 3 figures. BIC Classification: 1KBB; JPA; JPH; LND. Category: (P) Professional & Vocational. Dimension: 235 x 155 x 20. Weight in Grams: 482. . 2005. Illustrated. Paperback. . . . . Books ship from the US and Ireland.
Anbieter: Revaluation Books, Exeter, Vereinigtes Königreich
EUR 51,80
Anzahl: 2 verfügbar
In den WarenkorbPaperback. Zustand: Brand New. new title edition. 321 pages. 9.50x6.50x0.75 inches. In Stock.
EUR 36,51
Anzahl: Mehr als 20 verfügbar
In den WarenkorbKartoniert / Broschiert. Zustand: New. Essays contest the notion of the absolute preeminence of judicial review in constitutional interpretation, analyzing the role of Congress as a constitutional interpreter and responsible constitutional agentÜber den Autor.
Sprache: Englisch
Verlag: Duke University Press Jul 2005, 2005
ISBN 10: 082233612X ISBN 13: 9780822336129
Anbieter: AHA-BUCH GmbH, Einbeck, Deutschland
Taschenbuch. Zustand: Neu. Neuware - For more than a decade, the U.S. Supreme Court has turned a skeptical eye toward Congress. Distrustful of Congress's capacity to respect constitutional boundaries, the Court has recently overturned federal legislation at a historically unprecedented rate. This intensified judicial scrutiny highlights the need for increased attention to how Congress approaches constitutional issues. In this important collection, leading scholars in law and political science examine the role of Congress in constitutional interpretation, demonstrating how to better integrate the legislative branch into understandings of constitutional practice.