Sprache: Englisch
Verlag: New York University Press, 2000
ISBN 10: 0814731287 ISBN 13: 9780814731284
Anbieter: ThriftBooks-Atlanta, AUSTELL, GA, USA
Hardcover. Zustand: Good. No Jacket. Pages can have notes/highlighting. Spine may show signs of wear. ~ ThriftBooks: Read More, Spend Less.
Sprache: Englisch
Verlag: New York University Press, 2000
ISBN 10: 0814731287 ISBN 13: 9780814731284
Anbieter: ThriftBooks-Dallas, Dallas, TX, USA
Hardcover. Zustand: Very Good. No Jacket. May have limited writing in cover pages. Pages are unmarked. ~ ThriftBooks: Read More, Spend Less.
Sprache: Englisch
Verlag: New York University Press, 2000
ISBN 10: 0814731287 ISBN 13: 9780814731284
Anbieter: Better World Books, Mishawaka, IN, USA
Zustand: Good. 1 Edition. Pages intact with minimal writing/highlighting. The binding may be loose and creased. Dust jackets/supplements are not included. Stock photo provided. Product includes identifying sticker. Better World Books: Buy Books. Do Good.
Anbieter: Ria Christie Collections, Uxbridge, Vereinigtes Königreich
EUR 127,80
Anzahl: Mehr als 20 verfügbar
In den WarenkorbZustand: New. In.
Sprache: Englisch
Verlag: New York University Press, 2000
ISBN 10: 0814731287 ISBN 13: 9780814731284
Anbieter: Kennys Bookstore, Olney, MD, USA
EUR 182,62
Anzahl: Mehr als 20 verfügbar
In den WarenkorbZustand: New.
EUR 141,17
Anzahl: Mehr als 20 verfügbar
In den WarenkorbZustand: New. Evaluating the decision-making of Supreme Court Justices, this text blends traditional accounts of political philosophy to explain justices voting patterns. It illustrates how courts provide a thinly veiled moral judgment and how personal conceptions of mo.
Anbieter: Revaluation Books, Exeter, Vereinigtes Königreich
EUR 184,75
Anzahl: 2 verfügbar
In den WarenkorbHardcover. Zustand: Brand New. text is free of markings edition. 320 pages. 9.25x6.50x1.25 inches. In Stock.
Anbieter: AHA-BUCH GmbH, Einbeck, Deutschland
Buch. Zustand: Neu. Neuware - We like to think of judges and justices as making decisions based on the facts and the law. But to what extent do jurists decide cases in accordance with their own preexisting philosophy of law, and what specific ideological assumptions account for their decisions Stephen E. Gottlieb adopts a unique perspective on the decision-making of Supreme Court justices, blending and re-characterizing traditional accounts of political philosophy in a way that plausibly explains many of the justices' voting patterns. A seminal study of the Rehnquist Court, Morality Imposed illustrates how, in contrast to previous courts which took their mandate to be a move toward a freer and/or happier society, the current court evidences little concern for this goal, focusing instead on thinly veiled moral judgments. Delineating a fault line between liberal and conservative justices on the Rehnquist Court, Gottlieb suggests that conservative justices have rejected the basic principles that informed post-New Deal individual rights jurisprudence and have substituted their own conceptions of moral character for these fundamental principles. Morality Imposed adds substantially to our understanding of the Supreme Court, its most recent cases, and the evolution of judicial philosophy in the U.S.