Sprache: Englisch
Verlag: University North Carolina Pr, 1999
ISBN 10: 0807847380 ISBN 13: 9780807847381
Anbieter: Anybook.com, Lincoln, Vereinigtes Königreich
EUR 44,99
Anzahl: 1 verfügbar
In den WarenkorbZustand: Good. This is an ex-library book and may have the usual library/used-book markings inside.This book has soft covers. Clean from markings. In good all round condition. Please note the Image in this listing is a stock photo and may not match the covers of the actual item,950grams, ISBN:9780807847381.
Sprache: Englisch
Verlag: Univ of North Carolina Pr, 1999
ISBN 10: 0807847380 ISBN 13: 9780807847381
Anbieter: Ria Christie Collections, Uxbridge, Vereinigtes Königreich
EUR 85,95
Anzahl: Mehr als 20 verfügbar
In den WarenkorbZustand: New. In.
Sprache: Englisch
Verlag: Univ of North Carolina Pr, 1999
ISBN 10: 0807847380 ISBN 13: 9780807847381
Anbieter: Revaluation Books, Exeter, Vereinigtes Königreich
EUR 96,65
Anzahl: 2 verfügbar
In den WarenkorbPaperback. Zustand: Brand New. 608 pages. 9.25x6.25x1.50 inches. In Stock.
Sprache: Englisch
Verlag: University Of North Carolina Press Jan 1999, 1999
ISBN 10: 0807847380 ISBN 13: 9780807847381
Anbieter: AHA-BUCH GmbH, Einbeck, Deutschland
Taschenbuch. Zustand: Neu. Neuware - Challenging recent trends both in historical scholarship and in Supreme Court decisions on civil rights, J. Morgan Kousser criticizes the Court's ''postmodern equal protection'' and demonstrates that legislative and judicial history still matter for public policy. Offering an original interpretation of the failure of the First Reconstruction (after the Civil War) by comparing it with the relative success of the Second (after World War II), Kousser argues that institutions and institutional rules--not customs, ideas, attitudes, culture, or individual behavior--have been the primary forces shaping American race relations throughout the country's history. Using detailed case studies of redistricting decisions and the tailoring of electoral laws from Los Angeles to the Deep South, he documents how such rules were designed to discriminate against African Americans and Latinos. Kousser contends that far from being colorblind, Shaw v. Reno (1993) and subsequent ''racial gerrymandering'' decisions of the Supreme Court are intensely color-conscious. Far from being conservative, he argues, the five majority justices and their academic supporters are unreconstructed radicals who twist history and ignore current realities. A more balanced view of that history, he insists, dictates a reversal of Shaw and a return to the promise of both Reconstructions. |The first book-length study of the Supreme Court's ''racial gerrymandering'' decisions as well as the first sustained comparison of the First and Second Reconstructions.