Sprache: Englisch
Verlag: MK - Stanford University Press, 2005
ISBN 10: 0804751153 ISBN 13: 9780804751155
Anbieter: PBShop.store UK, Fairford, GLOS, Vereinigtes Königreich
EUR 138,72
Anzahl: 1 verfügbar
In den WarenkorbHRD. Zustand: New. New Book. Shipped from UK. Established seller since 2000.
Sprache: Englisch
Verlag: Stanford University Press, 2005
ISBN 10: 0804751153 ISBN 13: 9780804751155
Anbieter: Kennys Bookstore, Olney, MD, USA
Zustand: New. A Return to Aesthetics confronts postmodernism's rejection of aesthetics by showing that this critique rests on central concepts of classical aesthetic theory, namely autonomous form, disinterest, and symbolic discourse. Num Pages: 304 pages, Illustrations. BIC Classification: HPN. Category: (P) Professional & Vocational; (UP) Postgraduate, Research & Scholarly; (UU) Undergraduate. Dimension: 5817 x 3887 x 22. Weight in Grams: 517. . 2005. Hardback. . . . . Books ship from the US and Ireland.
Sprache: Englisch
Verlag: Stanford University Press, 2005
ISBN 10: 0804751153 ISBN 13: 9780804751155
Anbieter: moluna, Greven, Deutschland
EUR 143,99
Anzahl: Mehr als 20 verfügbar
In den WarenkorbGebunden. Zustand: New. A Return to Aesthetics confronts postmodernism s rejection of aesthetics by showing that this critique rests on central concepts of classical aesthetic theory, namely autonomous form, disinterest, and symbolic discourse.Über den Autor.
Anbieter: Revaluation Books, Exeter, Vereinigtes Königreich
EUR 190,05
Anzahl: 2 verfügbar
In den WarenkorbHardcover. Zustand: Brand New. 1st edition. 289 pages. 9.00x6.00x0.75 inches. In Stock.
Sprache: Englisch
Verlag: Stanford University Press Jul 2005, 2005
ISBN 10: 0804751153 ISBN 13: 9780804751155
Anbieter: AHA-BUCH GmbH, Einbeck, Deutschland
Buch. Zustand: Neu. Neuware - A Return to Aesthetics confronts postmodernism's rejection of aesthetics by showing that this critique rests on central concepts of classical aesthetic theory, namely autonomous form, disinterest, and symbolic discourse. The author argues for the value of these concepts by recovering them through a historical reinterpretation of their meaning prior to their distortion by twentieth-century formalism. Loesberg then applies these concepts to a discussion of two of the most significant critics of the ideology of Enlightenment, Foucault and Bourdieu. He argues that understanding the role of aesthetics in the postmodern critique of Enlightenment will get us out of the intellectual impasse wherein numbingly repeated attacks upon postmodernism as self-contradictory match numbingly repeated defenses. Construing postmodern critiques as examples of aesthetic reseeing gives us a new understanding of the postmodern critique of the Enlightenment.