Zustand: Very Good. Item in very good condition! Textbooks may not include supplemental items i.e. CDs, access codes etc.
Anbieter: ThriftBooks-Atlanta, AUSTELL, GA, USA
Paperback. Zustand: Very Good. No Jacket. May have limited writing in cover pages. Pages are unmarked. ~ ThriftBooks: Read More, Spend Less.
Anbieter: Books From California, Simi Valley, CA, USA
paperback. Zustand: Fine.
Anbieter: Revaluation Books, Exeter, Vereinigtes Königreich
EUR 28,52
Anzahl: 2 verfügbar
In den WarenkorbPaperback. Zustand: Brand New. reprint edition. 250 pages. 9.25x6.00x0.75 inches. In Stock.
Anbieter: Kennys Bookstore, Olney, MD, USA
Zustand: New. Series: American Institutions and Society. Num Pages: 264 pages, 5, 1 tables, 4 charts. BIC Classification: JNF. Category: (G) General (US: Trade). Dimension: 235 x 156 x 15. Weight in Grams: 399. . 2014. Illustrated. Paperback. . . . . Books ship from the US and Ireland.
EUR 24,95
Anzahl: Mehr als 20 verfügbar
In den WarenkorbZustand: New. In this work, Jesse H. Rhodes shows how the No Child Left Behind Act of 2002 and its prescriptive policies arose out of the dynamic of decentralized authority established in the American federal system.Über den AutorJesse H. Rho.
Sprache: Englisch
Verlag: Cornell University Press Jan 2014, 2014
ISBN 10: 0801479541 ISBN 13: 9780801479540
Anbieter: AHA-BUCH GmbH, Einbeck, Deutschland
Taschenbuch. Zustand: Neu. Neuware - Since the early 1990s, the federal role in education-exemplified by the controversial No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB)-has expanded dramatically. Yet states and localities have retained a central role in education policy, leading to a growing struggle for control over the direction of the nation's schools. In An Education in Politics, Jesse H. Rhodes explains the uneven development of federal involvement in education. While supporters of expanded federal involvement enjoyed some success in bringing new ideas to the federal policy agenda, Rhodes argues, they also encountered stiff resistance from proponents of local control. Built atop existing decentralized policies, new federal reforms raised difficult questions about which level of government bore ultimate responsibility for improving schools.