Sprache: Englisch
Verlag: Cornell University Press (edition Text is Free of Markings), 2005
ISBN 10: 0801472717 ISBN 13: 9780801472718
Anbieter: BooksRun, Philadelphia, PA, USA
Paperback. Zustand: Very Good. Text is Free of Markings. It's a well-cared-for item that has seen limited use. The item may show minor signs of wear. All the text is legible, with all pages included. It may have slight markings and/or highlighting.
Anbieter: ThriftBooks-Atlanta, AUSTELL, GA, USA
Paperback. Zustand: Good. No Jacket. Pages can have notes/highlighting. Spine may show signs of wear. ~ ThriftBooks: Read More, Spend Less.
Anbieter: Ammareal, Morangis, Frankreich
EUR 5,84
Anzahl: 1 verfügbar
In den WarenkorbSoftcover. Zustand: Très bon. Edition 1999. Ammareal reverse jusqu'à 15% du prix net de cet article à des organisations caritatives. ENGLISH DESCRIPTION Book Condition: Used, Very good. Edition 1999. Ammareal gives back up to 15% of this item's net price to charity organizations.
Anbieter: Revaluation Books, Exeter, Vereinigtes Königreich
EUR 64,42
Anzahl: 2 verfügbar
In den WarenkorbPaperback. Zustand: Brand New. text is free of markings edition. 336 pages. 9.00x6.00x1.00 inches. In Stock.
EUR 51,55
Anzahl: Mehr als 20 verfügbar
In den WarenkorbZustand: New. No concept sparks more controversy in constitutional debate than original intent. Offering a legal historian s approach to the subject, this book demonstrates that the framers deliberately obscured one of their more important decisions. Joseph M.
Sprache: Englisch
Verlag: Cornell University Press Aug 2005, 2005
ISBN 10: 0801472717 ISBN 13: 9780801472718
Anbieter: AHA-BUCH GmbH, Einbeck, Deutschland
Taschenbuch. Zustand: Neu. Neuware - He follows the disputes over the interpretation of this document - focusing on James Madison's changing views - as the new government took shape and political parties were formed. Lynch points out that the first six Congresses and President George Washington disregarded the framers' intentions when they were deemed impractical to follow. In contrast, he warns that the version of original intent put forth in recent Supreme Court opinions regarding congressional power could hinder Congress in serving the nation.