Hardcover. Zustand: Very Good. No Jacket. Former library book; May have limited writing in cover pages. Pages are unmarked. ~ ThriftBooks: Read More, Spend Less.
Hardcover. Zustand: Good. No Jacket. Pages can have notes/highlighting. Spine may show signs of wear. ~ ThriftBooks: Read More, Spend Less.
Hardcover. Zustand: Good. No Jacket. Pages can have notes/highlighting. Spine may show signs of wear. ~ ThriftBooks: Read More, Spend Less.
Sprache: Englisch
Verlag: MB - Cornell University Press, 2011
ISBN 10: 0801447933 ISBN 13: 9780801447938
Anbieter: PBShop.store UK, Fairford, GLOS, Vereinigtes Königreich
EUR 33,29
Anzahl: 1 verfügbar
In den WarenkorbHRD. Zustand: New. New Book. Shipped from UK. Established seller since 2000.
EUR 36,43
Anzahl: 2 verfügbar
In den WarenkorbHardcover. Zustand: Brand New. 1st edition. 224 pages. 9.25x6.25x1.00 inches. In Stock.
Zustand: New. Num Pages: 224 pages, black & white illustrations. BIC Classification: JPHC; LAB; LND. Category: (G) General (US: Trade). Dimension: 229 x 152 x 16. Weight in Grams: 457. . 2011. Hardcover. . . . . Books ship from the US and Ireland.
EUR 30,41
Anzahl: Mehr als 20 verfügbar
In den WarenkorbGebunden. Zustand: New. Elucidates the debate between constitutional originalism and the living constitution approach.Über den AutorRobert W. Bennett is Nathaniel L. Nathanson Professor of Law at Northwestern University and former dean of the scho.
Sprache: Englisch
Verlag: Cornell University Press Jun 2011, 2011
ISBN 10: 0801447933 ISBN 13: 9780801447938
Anbieter: AHA-BUCH GmbH, Einbeck, Deutschland
Buch. Zustand: Neu. Neuware - Problems of constitutional interpretation have many faces, but much of the contemporary discussion has focused on what has come to be called 'originalism.' The core of originalism is the belief that fidelity to the original understanding of the Constitution should constrain contemporary judges. As originalist thinking has evolved, it has become clear that there is a family of originalist theories, some emphasizing the intent of the framers, while others focus on the original public meaning of the constitutional text. This idea has enjoyed a modern resurgence, in good part in reaction to the assumption of more sweeping power by the judiciary, operating in the name of constitutional interpretation. Those arguing for a 'living Constitution' that keeps up with a changing world and changing values have resisted originalism. This difference in legal philosophy and jurisprudence has, since the 1970s, spilled over into party politics and the partisan wrangling over court appointments from appellate courts to the Supreme Court.