Sprache: Englisch
Verlag: Cambridge University Press, 2007
ISBN 10: 0521876648 ISBN 13: 9780521876643
Anbieter: Ria Christie Collections, Uxbridge, Vereinigtes Königreich
EUR 78,65
Anzahl: Mehr als 20 verfügbar
In den WarenkorbZustand: New. In.
Sprache: Englisch
Verlag: Cambridge University Press, 2007
ISBN 10: 0521876648 ISBN 13: 9780521876643
Anbieter: Kennys Bookstore, Olney, MD, USA
EUR 112,44
Anzahl: Mehr als 20 verfügbar
In den WarenkorbZustand: New. This book analyzes Chilean judicial behavior before, during, and after authoritarian rule. Series: Cambridge Studies in Law and Society. Num Pages: 316 pages, black & white illustrations. BIC Classification: 1KLSH; JPH; LAM. Category: (G) General (US: Trade); (P) Professional & Vocational. Dimension: 228 x 152 x 22. Weight in Grams: 566. . 2007. 1st Edition. hardcover. . . . . Books ship from the US and Ireland.
Anbieter: Revaluation Books, Exeter, Vereinigtes Königreich
EUR 110,16
Anzahl: 2 verfügbar
In den WarenkorbHardcover. Zustand: Brand New. 1st edition. 299 pages. 9.00x6.25x1.00 inches. In Stock.
Sprache: Englisch
Verlag: Cambridge University Press, 2007
ISBN 10: 0521876648 ISBN 13: 9780521876643
Anbieter: AHA-BUCH GmbH, Einbeck, Deutschland
Buch. Zustand: Neu. Druck auf Anfrage Neuware - Printed after ordering - Why did formally independent Chilean judges, trained under and appointed by democratic governments, facilitate and condone the illiberal, antidemocratic, and anti-legal policies of the Pinochet regime Challenging the common assumption that adjudication in non-democratic settings is fundamentally different and less puzzling than it is in democratic regimes, this book offers a longitudinal analysis of judicial behavior, demonstrating striking continuity in judicial performance across regimes in Chile. The work explores the relevance of judges' personal policy preferences, social class, and legal philosophy, but argues that institutional factors best explain the persistent failure of judges to takes stands in defense of rights and rule of law principles. Specifically, the institutional structure and ideology of the Chilean judiciary, grounded in the ideal of judicial apoliticism, furnished judges with professional understandings and incentives that left them unequipped and disinclined to take stands in defense of liberal democratic principles, before, during, and after the authoritarian interlude.