9780521857734 - Law, Legitimacy and the Rationing of Health Care: A Contextual and Comparative Perspective (Cambridge Law, Medicine and Ethics) (Cambridge Law, Medicine and Ethics,... (7 Ergebnisse)

Hardcover. Zustand: Very Good. Law, Legitimacy and the Rationing of Health Care: A Contextual and Comparative Perspective: 6 (Cambridge Law, Medicine and Ethics, Series Number 6) This book is in very good condition and will be shipped within 24 hours of ordering. The cover may have some limited signs of wear but the pages are clean, intact and the spine remains undamaged. This book has clearly been well maintained and looked after thus far. Money back guarantee if you are not satisfied. See all our books here, order more than 1 book and get discounted shipping.

Hardcover. Zustand: Very Good. This book is in very good condition and will be shipped within 24 hours of ordering. The cover may have some limited signs of wear but the pages are clean, intact and the spine remains undamaged. This book has clearly been well maintained and looked after thus far. Money back guarantee if you are not satisfied. See all our books here, order more than 1 book and get discounted shipping.

Zustand: New.

Zustand: New. In.

Zustand: New. Dr Syrett evaluates how courts may contribute to the attainment of legitimacy in healthcare rationing. Series: Cambridge Law, Medicine & Ethics. Num Pages: 266 pages. BIC Classification: LA. Category: (P) Professional & Vocational. Dimension: 228 x 152 x 20. Weight in Grams: 566. . 2007. 1st Edition. hardcover. . . . . Books ship from the US and Ireland.

Hardcover. Zustand: Brand New. 1st edition. 300 pages. 9.75x6.50x0.75 inches. In Stock.

Buch. Zustand: Neu. Druck auf Anfrage Neuware - Printed after ordering - Dr Keith Syrett argues for a reappraisal of the role of public law adjudication in questions of healthcare rationing. As governments worldwide turn to explicit rationing strategies to manage the mismatch between demand for and supply of health services and treatments, disappointed patients and the public have sought to contest the moral authority of bodies making rationing decisions. This has led to the growing involvement of law in this field of public policy. The author argues that, rather than bemoaning this development, those working within the health policy community should recognise the points of confluence between the principles and purposes of public law and the proposals which have been made to address rationing's 'legitimacy problem'. Drawing upon jurisprudence from England, Canada and South Africa, the book evaluates the capacity of courts to establish the conditions for a process of public deliberation from which legitimacy for healthcare rationing may be derived.