Sprache: Englisch
Verlag: Cambridge University Press, 2005
ISBN 10: 0521847265 ISBN 13: 9780521847261
Anbieter: Ria Christie Collections, Uxbridge, Vereinigtes Königreich
EUR 156,70
Anzahl: Mehr als 20 verfügbar
In den WarenkorbZustand: New. In.
Sprache: Englisch
Verlag: Cambridge University Press, 2005
ISBN 10: 0521847265 ISBN 13: 9780521847261
Anbieter: Kennys Bookstore, Olney, MD, USA
EUR 222,49
Anzahl: Mehr als 20 verfügbar
In den WarenkorbZustand: New. This book examines why copyright exceptions are necessary and the forces that have shaped the UK legislation. Series: Cambridge Intellectual Property and Information Law. Num Pages: 458 pages, black & white illustrations. BIC Classification: 1DBKE; 1DBKW; LNRC. Category: (P) Professional & Vocational. Dimension: 228 x 152 x 30. Weight in Grams: 880. . 2005. hardcover. . . . . Books ship from the US and Ireland.
Anbieter: Revaluation Books, Exeter, Vereinigtes Königreich
EUR 219,39
Anzahl: 2 verfügbar
In den WarenkorbHardcover. Zustand: Brand New. new title edition. 458 pages. 9.50x6.50x1.50 inches. In Stock.
Sprache: Englisch
Verlag: Cambridge University Press, 2005
ISBN 10: 0521847265 ISBN 13: 9780521847261
Anbieter: AHA-BUCH GmbH, Einbeck, Deutschland
Buch. Zustand: Neu. Druck auf Anfrage Neuware - Printed after ordering - This book was first published in 2005. Copyright 'exceptions' or 'users' rights' have become a highly controversial aspect of copyright law. Most recently, Member States of the European Union have been forced to amend their systems of exceptions so as to comply with the Information Society Directive. Taking the newly amended UK legislation as a case study, this book examines why copyright exceptions are necessary and the forces that have shaped the present legislative regime in the UK. It seeks to further our understanding of the exceptions by combining detailed doctrinal analysis with insights gained from a range of other sources. The principal argument of the book is that the UK's current system of 'permitted acts' is much too restrictive and hence is in urgent need of reform, but that paradoxically the Information Society Directive points the way towards a much more satisfactory approach.