Sprache: Englisch
Verlag: Cambridge University Press, 2003
ISBN 10: 0521830605 ISBN 13: 9780521830607
Anbieter: Romtrade Corp., STERLING HEIGHTS, MI, USA
Zustand: New. This is a Brand-new US Edition. This Item may be shipped from US or any other country as we have multiple locations worldwide.
Sprache: Englisch
Verlag: Cambridge University Press, 2003
ISBN 10: 0521830605 ISBN 13: 9780521830607
Anbieter: Majestic Books, Hounslow, Vereinigtes Königreich
EUR 56,63
Anzahl: 1 verfügbar
In den WarenkorbZustand: New. pp. 298 9:B&W 6 x 9 in or 229 x 152 mm Case Laminate on Creme w/Gloss Lam.
Sprache: Englisch
Verlag: Cambridge University Press, 2003
ISBN 10: 0521830605 ISBN 13: 9780521830607
Anbieter: Kennys Bookstore, Olney, MD, USA
EUR 170,84
Anzahl: Mehr als 20 verfügbar
In den WarenkorbZustand: New. A conceptual and historical inquiry into the concept of self-interest before Adam Smith. Series: Ideas in Context. Num Pages: 298 pages, black & white illustrations. BIC Classification: 3JF; JFCX; JPA; KCA. Category: (P) Professional & Vocational. Dimension: 228 x 152 x 21. Weight in Grams: 609. . 2003. hardcover. . . . . Books ship from the US and Ireland.
Sprache: Englisch
Verlag: Cambridge University Press, 2003
ISBN 10: 0521830605 ISBN 13: 9780521830607
Anbieter: AHA-BUCH GmbH, Einbeck, Deutschland
Buch. Zustand: Neu. Druck auf Anfrage Neuware - Printed after ordering - Self-Interest before Adam Smith inquires into the foundations of economic theory. It is generally assumed that the birth of modern economic science, marked by the publication of The Wealth of Nations in 1776, was the triumph of the 'selfish hypothesis' (the idea that self-interest is the motive of human action). Yet, as a neo-Epicurean idea, this hypothesis had been a matter of controversy for over a century and Smith opposed it from a neo-Stoic point of view. But how can the Epicurean principles of orthodox economic theory be reconciled with the Stoic principles of Adam Smith's philosophy Pierre Force shows how Smith's theory refutes the 'selfish hypothesis' and integrates it at the same time. He also explains how Smith appropriated Rousseau's 'republican' critique of modern commercial society, and makes the case that the autonomy of economic science is an unintended consequence of Smith's 'republican' principles.