Sprache: Englisch
Verlag: Cambridge University Press, 2003
ISBN 10: 0521816750 ISBN 13: 9780521816755
Anbieter: Ria Christie Collections, Uxbridge, Vereinigtes Königreich
EUR 102,10
Anzahl: Mehr als 20 verfügbar
In den WarenkorbZustand: New. In.
Sprache: Englisch
Verlag: Cambridge University Press, 2003
ISBN 10: 0521816750 ISBN 13: 9780521816755
Anbieter: Kennys Bookstore, Olney, MD, USA
EUR 138,38
Anzahl: Mehr als 20 verfügbar
In den WarenkorbZustand: New. This book argues that governments enter IMF programs for economic and political reasons. Num Pages: 216 pages, 37 b/w illus. 24 tables. BIC Classification: JPH; KCM; KCP. Category: (P) Professional & Vocational; (U) Tertiary Education (US: College). Dimension: 228 x 152 x 16. Weight in Grams: 404. . 2003. Illustrated. hardcover. . . . . Books ship from the US and Ireland.
Sprache: Englisch
Verlag: Cambridge University Press, 2003
ISBN 10: 0521816750 ISBN 13: 9780521816755
Anbieter: AHA-BUCH GmbH, Einbeck, Deutschland
Buch. Zustand: Neu. Druck auf Anfrage Neuware - Printed after ordering - Why do governments turn to the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and with what effects This book argues that governments enter IMF programs for economic and political reasons, and finds that the effects are negative on economic growth and income distribution. By bringing in the IMF, governments gain political leverage - via conditionality - to push through unpopular policies. Note that if governments desiring conditions are more likely to participate, estimating program effects is not straightforward: one must control for the potentially unobserved political determinants of selection. This book addresses the selection problem using a dynamic bivariate version of the Heckman model analyzing cross-national time-series data. The main finding is that the negative effects of IMF programs on economic growth are mitigated for certain constituencies since programs also have distributional consequences. But IMF programs doubly hurt the least well off in society: they lower growth and shift the income distribution upward.