ISBN: 9780521584883 - christology and the synoptic problem: an argument for markan priority (society for new testament studies monograph series) (8 Ergebnisse)

Hardcover. Zustand: Very Good. Zustand des Schutzumschlags: Very Good. 1st Edition. hardback, octavo, a very good tightly bound copy with a clean and unmarked text and in a well preserved dust jacket, xviii + 337pp.

Zustand: Good. Former library copy. Pages intact with minimal writing/highlighting. The binding may be loose and creased. Dust jackets/supplements are not included. Includes library markings. Stock photo provided. Product includes identifying sticker. Better World Books: Buy Books. Do Good.

Zustand: Poor. Volume 94. This is an ex-library book and may have the usual library/used-book markings inside.This book has hardback covers. Book contains pen markings. In poor condition, suitable as a reading copy. Dust jacket in good condition. Please note the Image in this listing is a stock photo and may not match the covers of the actual item,600grams, ISBN:9780521584883.…

Zustand: New.

Zustand: New. The first thorough scholarly treatment of the christological argument for Markan priority. Series: Society for New Testament Studies Monograph Series. Num Pages: 356 pages, bibliography, index. BIC Classification: HRCG9. Category: (P) Professional & Vocational. Dimension: 216 x 138 x 24. Weight in Grams: 525. . 1997. hardcover. . . . .…

hardcover. Zustand: New. In shrink wrap. Looks like an interesting title.

Zustand: New. The first thorough scholarly treatment of the christological argument for Markan priority. Series: Society for New Testament Studies Monograph Series. Num Pages: 356 pages, bibliography, index. BIC Classification: HRCG9. Category: (P) Professional & Vocational. Dimension: 216 x 138 x 24. Weight in Grams: 525. . 1997. hardcover. . . . . Books ship from the US and Ireland.…

Buch. Zustand: Neu. Druck auf Anfrage Neuware - Printed after ordering - This book makes a major contribution to the ongoing debate about the synoptic problem, especially concerning the question of which gospel was written first. The scholarly consensus, developed over two hundred years of discussion, has favoured Markan priority and the dependence of both Matthew and Luke upon Mark. In an ongoing contemporary revival of the Griesbach hypothesis, some scholars have advocated the view that Mark used, conflated and abbreviated Matthew and Luke. The author explores the role played by arguments connected with christological development in support of both these views. Deploying a comparative redaction-critical approach to the problem, Dr Head argues that the critical basis of the standard christological argument for Markan priority is insecure and based on anachronistic scholarly concerns. Nevertheless, in a through-going comparative reappraisal of the christological outlooks of Matthew and Mark the author finds decisive support for the hypothesis of Markan priority, arguing that Matthew was a developer rather than a corrector of Mark.…