Sprache: Englisch
Verlag: Cambridge University Press, 2006
ISBN 10: 0521536669 ISBN 13: 9780521536660
Anbieter: Better World Books Ltd, Dunfermline, Vereinigtes Königreich
EUR 29,57
Anzahl: 1 verfügbar
In den WarenkorbZustand: Very Good. Former library copy. Pages intact with possible writing/highlighting. Binding strong with minor wear. Dust jackets/supplements may not be included. Includes library markings. Stock photo provided. Product includes identifying sticker. Better World Books: Buy Books. Do Good.
Sprache: Englisch
Verlag: Cambridge University Press, 2006
ISBN 10: 0521536669 ISBN 13: 9780521536660
Anbieter: Ria Christie Collections, Uxbridge, Vereinigtes Königreich
EUR 53,97
Anzahl: Mehr als 20 verfügbar
In den WarenkorbZustand: New. In.
Anbieter: Revaluation Books, Exeter, Vereinigtes Königreich
EUR 72,51
Anzahl: 2 verfügbar
In den WarenkorbPaperback. Zustand: Brand New. 240 pages. 8.75x6.00x0.60 inches. In Stock.
Sprache: Englisch
Verlag: Cambridge University Press, 2006
ISBN 10: 0521536669 ISBN 13: 9780521536660
Anbieter: Kennys Bookstore, Olney, MD, USA
Zustand: New. Behavioral Social Choice looks at the probabilistic foundations of collective decision-making rules. Num Pages: 258 pages, 8 tables. BIC Classification: JMH. Category: (P) Professional & Vocational. Dimension: 154 x 230 x 11. Weight in Grams: 356. . 2006. Illustrated. paperback. . . . . Books ship from the US and Ireland.
Sprache: Englisch
Verlag: Cambridge University Press, 2006
ISBN 10: 0521536669 ISBN 13: 9780521536660
Anbieter: AHA-BUCH GmbH, Einbeck, Deutschland
Taschenbuch. Zustand: Neu. Druck auf Anfrage Neuware - Printed after ordering - Behavioral Social Choice looks at the probabilistic foundations of collective decision-making rules. The authors challenge much of the existing theoretical wisdom about social choice processes, and seek to restore faith in the possibility of democratic decision-making. In particular, they argue that worries about the supposed prevalence of majority rule cycles that would preclude groups from reaching a final decision about what alternative they prefer have been greatly overstated. They provide new insights into how alternative model specifications can change our estimates of social orderings.