Sprache: Englisch
Verlag: Cambridge University Press, 1986
ISBN 10: 0521338530 ISBN 13: 9780521338530
Anbieter: Anybook.com, Lincoln, Vereinigtes Königreich
EUR 15,12
Anzahl: 1 verfügbar
In den WarenkorbZustand: Poor. This is an ex-library book and may have the usual library/used-book markings inside.This book has soft covers. In poor condition, suitable as a reading copy. Please note the Image in this listing is a stock photo and may not match the covers of the actual item,550grams, ISBN:0521338530.
Sprache: Englisch
Verlag: Cambridge University Press, 1986
ISBN 10: 0521338530 ISBN 13: 9780521338530
Anbieter: Ria Christie Collections, Uxbridge, Vereinigtes Königreich
EUR 39,69
Anzahl: Mehr als 20 verfügbar
In den WarenkorbZustand: New. In.
Sprache: Englisch
Verlag: Cambridge University Press, 1986
ISBN 10: 0521338530 ISBN 13: 9780521338530
Anbieter: Kennys Bookstore, Olney, MD, USA
Zustand: New. In this book Ian Shapiro offers a systematic comparative evaluation of the writings of contemporary liberal rights theorists and those of their seventeenth-century predecessors. Num Pages: 340 pages, bibliography, index. BIC Classification: JPVH. Category: (U) Tertiary Education (US: College). Dimension: 229 x 152 x 19. Weight in Grams: 500. . 2009. paperback. . . . . Books ship from the US and Ireland.
Anbieter: Revaluation Books, Exeter, Vereinigtes Königreich
EUR 54,15
Anzahl: 2 verfügbar
In den WarenkorbPaperback. Zustand: Brand New. 336 pages. 8.98x5.98x0.87 inches. In Stock.
Sprache: Englisch
Verlag: Cambridge University Press, 1986
ISBN 10: 0521338530 ISBN 13: 9780521338530
Anbieter: AHA-BUCH GmbH, Einbeck, Deutschland
Taschenbuch. Zustand: Neu. Druck auf Anfrage Neuware - Printed after ordering - In this book Ian Shapiro offers a systematic comparative evaluation of the writings of contemporary liberal rights theorists and those of their seventeenth-century predecessors. He shows how contemporary arguments about rights and justice evolved out of the contractarian tradition of the seventeenth century but he argues that they are lethal mutation of that tradition. Some of the deepest difficulties of contemporary rights theories derive from the appropriation of parts of the older tradition without the unifying assumptions about knowledge and science that gave the seventeenth-century arguments their underlying coherence. Those assumptions are no longer available to us, making it impossible for us to return to the internally more consistent philosophies of the liberal past. Shapiro draws out the implications of his analysis for current disputes within liberalism between rights theorists and utilitarians and for disputes between liberals and communitarians, arguing that the communitarian critics of liberalism are in danger of incorporating its most serious weaknesses.