Sprache: Englisch
Verlag: Cambridge University Press, 1992
ISBN 10: 0521319811 ISBN 13: 9780521319812
Anbieter: Ria Christie Collections, Uxbridge, Vereinigtes Königreich
EUR 55,77
Anzahl: Mehr als 20 verfügbar
In den WarenkorbZustand: New. In.
Sprache: Englisch
Verlag: Cambridge University Press, 1992
ISBN 10: 0521319811 ISBN 13: 9780521319812
Anbieter: Kennys Bookstore, Olney, MD, USA
Zustand: New. The goal of this study is to challenge the monopoly of arbitrariness, which has possibly affected many models of linguistic description and analysis. Series: Cambridge Studies in Linguistics. Num Pages: 296 pages, black & white illustrations. BIC Classification: CF. Category: (U) Tertiary Education (US: College). Dimension: 229 x 152 x 17. Weight in Grams: 440. . 2009. 1st Edition. paperback. . . . . Books ship from the US and Ireland.
Sprache: Englisch
Verlag: Cambridge University Press, 1992
ISBN 10: 0521319811 ISBN 13: 9780521319812
Anbieter: AHA-BUCH GmbH, Einbeck, Deutschland
Taschenbuch. Zustand: Neu. Druck auf Anfrage Neuware - Printed after ordering - The view that language is in some way 'arbitrary', that there is no formal relationship between a linguistic message and the thought it is meant to convey, is long established and pervasive. The goal of John Haiman's study is to challenge the monopoly of arbitrariness, which he believes has affected in significant ways many models of linguistic description and analysis, notably those proposed by Saussure and more recently by Chomsky and his associates. Linguistic structures, Dr Hainian claims, may be compared to (non-linguistic) diagrams of our thoughts, and deviate from iconicity in many of the same ways and for much the same reasons as do diagrams in general. Arbitrariness develops as a result of the relatively familiar principles of economy, generalization and association. In relation to this thesis, Dr Haiman considers a wide variety of constructions, including conditionals and interrogatives, gapping, causative structures, auxiliaries and reflexives, and provides a wealth of exemplification from different languages that also points to typological differences in respect of iconicity.