Sprache: Englisch
Verlag: Cambridge University Press, 1986
ISBN 10: 0521310156 ISBN 13: 9780521310154
Anbieter: Books From California, Simi Valley, CA, USA
Paperback. Zustand: Fine.
Sprache: Englisch
Verlag: Cambridge University Press, 1986
ISBN 10: 0521310156 ISBN 13: 9780521310154
Anbieter: Ria Christie Collections, Uxbridge, Vereinigtes Königreich
EUR 62,76
Anzahl: Mehr als 20 verfügbar
In den WarenkorbZustand: New. In.
Sprache: Englisch
Verlag: Cambridge University Press, 1986
ISBN 10: 0521310156 ISBN 13: 9780521310154
Anbieter: Kennys Bookstore, Olney, MD, USA
Zustand: New. This book is Heinrich Rickert's most important work. It presents his systematic theory of knowledge and philosophy of science. Editor(s): Oakes, Guy. Translator(s): Oakes, G. Series: Texts in German Philosophy. Num Pages: 276 pages, index. BIC Classification: PDA. Category: (U) Tertiary Education (US: College). Dimension: 155 x 229 x 24. Weight in Grams: 430. . 2009. Abridged. paperback. . . . . Books ship from the US and Ireland.
Sprache: Englisch
Verlag: Cambridge University Press, 1986
ISBN 10: 0521310156 ISBN 13: 9780521310154
Anbieter: AHA-BUCH GmbH, Einbeck, Deutschland
Taschenbuch. Zustand: Neu. Druck auf Anfrage Neuware - Printed after ordering - Heinrich Rickert (1863-1936) was one of the leading neo-Kantian philosophers in Germany and a crucial figure in the discussions of the foundations of the social sciences in the first quarter of the twentieth century. His views were extremely influential, most significantly on Max Weber. The Limits of Concept Formation in Natural Science is Rickert's most important work, and it is here translated into English for the first time. It presents his systematic theory of knowledge and philosophy of science, and deals particularly with historical knowledge and the problem of demarcating the natural from the human sciences. The theory Rickert develops is carefully argued and of great intrinsic interest. It departs from both positivism and neo-Hegelian idealism and is worked out by contrast to the views of others, particularly Dilthey and the early phenomenologists.