Sprache: Englisch
Verlag: Cambridge University Press, 1976
ISBN 10: 0521290597 ISBN 13: 9780521290593
Anbieter: Ria Christie Collections, Uxbridge, Vereinigtes Königreich
EUR 53,45
Anzahl: Mehr als 20 verfügbar
In den WarenkorbZustand: New. In.
Sprache: Englisch
Verlag: Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1976
ISBN 10: 0521290597 ISBN 13: 9780521290593
Anbieter: San Francisco Book Company, Paris, Frankreich
Paperback. Zustand: Very good. Paperback Octavo. wraps, 232 pp, top edge and fore edge, lightly, foxed, bottom edge lightly soiled Standard shipping (no tracking or insurance) / Priority (with tracking) / Custom quote for large or heavy orders.
Anbieter: Revaluation Books, Exeter, Vereinigtes Königreich
EUR 70,91
Anzahl: 2 verfügbar
In den WarenkorbPaperback. Zustand: Brand New. 244 pages. 8.25x5.25x0.50 inches. In Stock.
Sprache: Englisch
Verlag: Cambridge University Press, 1976
ISBN 10: 0521290597 ISBN 13: 9780521290593
Anbieter: Kennys Bookstore, Olney, MD, USA
Zustand: New.
Sprache: Englisch
Verlag: Cambridge University Press, 1976
ISBN 10: 0521290597 ISBN 13: 9780521290593
Anbieter: AHA-BUCH GmbH, Einbeck, Deutschland
Taschenbuch. Zustand: Neu. Druck auf Anfrage Neuware - Printed after ordering - This book is a philosophical study of the basic principles of statistical reasoning. Professor Hacking has sought to discover the simple principles which underlie modern work in mathematical statistics and to test them, both at a philosophical level and in terms of their practical consequences fort statisticians. The ideas of modern logic are used to analyse these principles, and results are presented without the use of unfamiliar symbolism. It begins with a philosophical analysis of a few central concepts and then, using an elementary system of logic, develops most of the standard statistical theory. the analysis provides answers to many disputed questions about how to test statistical hypotheses and about how to estimate quantities in the light of statistical data. One product of the analysis is a sound and consistent rationale for R. A. Fisher's controversial concept of 'fiducial probability'.