Sprache: Englisch
Verlag: Cambridge University Press, 2012
ISBN 10: 0521279690 ISBN 13: 9780521279697
Anbieter: ThriftBooks-Dallas, Dallas, TX, USA
Paperback. Zustand: Very Good. No Jacket. May have limited writing in cover pages. Pages are unmarked. ~ ThriftBooks: Read More, Spend Less.
Sprache: Englisch
Verlag: Cambridge University Press, 2012
ISBN 10: 0521279690 ISBN 13: 9780521279697
Anbieter: Ria Christie Collections, Uxbridge, Vereinigtes Königreich
EUR 39,47
Anzahl: Mehr als 20 verfügbar
In den WarenkorbZustand: New. In.
EUR 53,53
Anzahl: 2 verfügbar
In den WarenkorbPaperback. Zustand: Brand New. 1st edition. 314 pages. 9.00x6.00x0.75 inches. In Stock.
Sprache: Englisch
Verlag: Cambridge University Press, 2012
ISBN 10: 0521279690 ISBN 13: 9780521279697
Anbieter: Kennys Bookstore, Olney, MD, USA
Zustand: New. 2012. 1st Edition. Paperback. This book explores the diverse understandings of the archaeological record in both historical and contemporary perspective, while also serving as a guide to reassessing current views. Num Pages: 314 pages, 21 b/w illus. 6 tables. BIC Classification: HD. Category: (U) Tertiary Education (US: College). Dimension: 228 x 152 x 16. Weight in Grams: 434. 314 pages, 21 b/w illus. 6 tables. This book explores the diverse understandings of the archaeological record in both historical and contemporary perspective, while also serving as a guide to reassessing current views. Cateogry: (U) Tertiary Education (US: College). BIC Classification: HD. Dimension: 228 x 152 x 16. Weight: 434. . . . . . Books ship from the US and Ireland.
Sprache: Englisch
Verlag: Cambridge University Press, 2012
ISBN 10: 0521279690 ISBN 13: 9780521279697
Anbieter: AHA-BUCH GmbH, Einbeck, Deutschland
Taschenbuch. Zustand: Neu. Druck auf Anfrage Neuware - Printed after ordering - This book explores the diverse understandings of the archaeological record in both historical and contemporary perspective, while also serving as a guide to reassessing current views. Gavin Lucas argues that archaeological theory has become both too fragmented and disconnected from the particular nature of archaeological evidence. The book examines three ways of understanding the archaeological record - as historical sources, through formation theory and as material culture - then reveals ways to connect these three domains through a reconsideration of archaeological entities and archaeological practice. Ultimately, Lucas calls for a rethinking of the nature of the archaeological record and the kind of history and narratives written from it.