Isbn: 9780521140911 - the language of law and the foundations of american constitutionalism (6 Ergebnisse)

paperback. Zustand: Very Good. Shipped within 24 hours from our UK warehouse. Clean, undamaged book with no damage to pages and minimal wear to the cover. Spine still tight, in very good condition. Remember if you are not happy, you are covered by our 100% money back guarantee.

Paperback. Zustand: Very Good. The Language of Law and the Foundations of American Constitutionalism This book is in very good condition and will be shipped within 24 hours of ordering. The cover may have some limited signs of wear but the pages are clean, intact and the spine remains undamaged. This book has clearly been well maintained and looked after thus far. Money back guarantee if you are not satisfied. See all our books here, order more than 1 book and get discounted shipping. …

Zustand: New. In English.

Zustand: New. Argues that the Founders intended the Constitution to be interpreted according to the text's meaning and its framers' original intentions. Num Pages: 428 pages. BIC Classification: 1KBB; JPHC; LAZ; LND. Category: (P) Professional & Vocational. Dimension: 232 x 159 x 24. Weight in Grams: 596. . 2010. paperback. . . . . Books ship from the US and Ireland.…

Paperback. Zustand: Brand New. 409 pages. 9.25x6.25x1.00 inches. In Stock.

Taschenbuch. Zustand: Neu. Druck auf Anfrage Neuware - Printed after ordering - For much of its history, the interpretation of the United States Constitution presupposed judges seeking the meaning of the text and the original intentions behind that text, a process that was deemed by Chief Justice John Marshall to be 'the most sacred rule of interpretation'. Since the end of the nineteenth century, a radically new understanding has developed in which the moral intuition of the judges is allowed to supplant the Constitution's original meaning as the foundation of interpretation. The Founders' Constitution of fixed and permanent meaning has been replaced by the idea of a 'living' or evolving constitution. Gary L. McDowell refutes this new understanding, recovering the theoretical grounds of the original Constitution as understood by those who framed and ratified it. It was, he argues, the intention of the Founders that the judiciary must be bound by the original meaning of the Constitution when interpreting it.…