ISBN: 9780521118316 - healthcare decision-making and the law: autonomy, capacity and the limits of liberalism (cambridge law, medicine and ethics) (7 Ergebnisse)

Hardcover. Zustand: Very Good. Shipped within 24 hours from our UK warehouse. Clean, undamaged book with no damage to pages and minimal wear to the cover. Spine still tight, in very good condition. Remember if you are not happy, you are covered by our 100% money back guarantee.

Hardcover. Zustand: Very Good. Healthcare Decision-Making and the Law: Autonomy, Capacity and the Limits of Liberalism: 12 (Cambridge Law, Medicine and Ethics, Series Number 12) This book is in very good condition and will be shipped within 24 hours of ordering. The cover may have some limited signs of wear but the pages are clean, intact and the spine remains undamaged. This book has clearly been well maintained and looked after thus far. Money back guarantee if you are not satisfied. See all our books here, order more than 1 book and get discounted shipping.…

Zustand: Very Good.

Zustand: New. In English.

Zustand: New. A critical evaluation of the law's engagement with the process of healthcare decision-making, and how the relationship might be enhanced. Series: Cambridge Law, Medicine & Ethics. Num Pages: 344 pages. BIC Classification: 1DBKE; 1DBKW; LNTM; MBDC. Category: (P) Professional & Vocational. Dimension: 228 x 152 x 20. Weight in Grams: 660. . 2010. 1st Edition. hardcover. . . . . Books ship from the US and Ireland. …

Hardcover. Zustand: Brand New. 1st edition. 320 pages. 9.00x6.00x0.75 inches. In Stock.

Buch. Zustand: Neu. Druck auf Anfrage Neuware - Printed after ordering - This analysis of the law's approach to healthcare decision-making critiques its liberal foundations in respect of three categories of people: adults with capacity, adults without capacity and adults who are subject to mental health legislation. Focusing primarily on the law in England and Wales, the analysis also draws on the law in the United States, legal positions in Australia, Canada, Ireland, New Zealand and Scotland and on the human rights protections provided by the ECHR and the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. Having identified the limitations of a legal view of autonomy as primarily a principle of non-interference, Mary Donnelly questions the effectiveness of capacity as a gatekeeper for the right of autonomy and advocates both an increased role for human rights in developing the conceptual basis for the law and the grounding of future legal developments in a close empirical interrogation of the law in practice.…