Sprache: Englisch
Verlag: Cambridge University Press, 2010
ISBN 10: 0521111153 ISBN 13: 9780521111157
Anbieter: Ria Christie Collections, Uxbridge, Vereinigtes Königreich
EUR 164,18
Anzahl: Mehr als 20 verfügbar
In den WarenkorbZustand: New. In.
Sprache: Englisch
Verlag: Cambridge University Press, 2010
ISBN 10: 0521111153 ISBN 13: 9780521111157
Anbieter: Kennys Bookstore, Olney, MD, USA
EUR 232,56
Anzahl: Mehr als 20 verfügbar
In den WarenkorbZustand: New. This book explores international criminal fact-finding to reveal that the ability to determine who did what to whom in criminal trials is impaired. Num Pages: 430 pages. BIC Classification: LBBZ. Category: (P) Professional & Vocational. Dimension: 236 x 154 x 25. Weight in Grams: 712. . 2010. 1st Edition. hardcover. . . . . Books ship from the US and Ireland.
Anbieter: Revaluation Books, Exeter, Vereinigtes Königreich
EUR 232,75
Anzahl: 2 verfügbar
In den WarenkorbHardcover. Zustand: Brand New. 1st edition. 420 pages. 9.50x6.25x1.00 inches. In Stock.
Sprache: Englisch
Verlag: Cambridge University Press, 2010
ISBN 10: 0521111153 ISBN 13: 9780521111157
Anbieter: AHA-BUCH GmbH, Einbeck, Deutschland
Buch. Zustand: Neu. Druck auf Anfrage Neuware - Printed after ordering - Fact-Finding Without Facts explores international criminal fact-finding - empirically, conceptually, and normatively. After reviewing thousands of pages of transcripts from various international criminal tribunals, the author reveals that international criminal trials are beset by numerous and severe fact-finding impediments that substantially impair the tribunals' ability to determine who did what to whom. These fact-finding impediments have heretofore received virtually no publicity, let alone scholarly treatment, and they are deeply troubling not only because they raise grave concerns about the accuracy of the judgments currently being issued but because they can be expected to similarly impair the next generation of international trials that will be held at the International Criminal Court. After setting forth her empirical findings, the author considers their conceptual and normative implications. The author concludes that international criminal tribunals purport a fact-finding competence that they do not possess and, as a consequence, base their judgments on a less precise, more amorphous method of fact-finding than they publicly acknowledge.