Sprache: Englisch
Verlag: Cambridge University Press, 1973
ISBN 10: 0521098149 ISBN 13: 9780521098144
Anbieter: G. & J. CHESTERS, TAMWORTH, Vereinigtes Königreich
EUR 2,60
Anzahl: 1 verfügbar
In den WarenkorbSoft cover. Zustand: Very Good. 327 pages, a generally VG ex-library copy pbk [0521098149].
Sprache: Englisch
Verlag: Cambridge University Press, 1973
ISBN 10: 0521098149 ISBN 13: 9780521098144
Anbieter: Hay-on-Wye Booksellers, Hay-on-Wye, HEREF, Vereinigtes Königreich
EUR 8,24
Anzahl: 1 verfügbar
In den WarenkorbZustand: Good. Signed by author. Minor shelfwear to covers and extremities of book, otherwise fine.
Sprache: Englisch
Verlag: Cambridge University Press, 1973
ISBN 10: 0521098149 ISBN 13: 9780521098144
Anbieter: Ria Christie Collections, Uxbridge, Vereinigtes Königreich
EUR 47,93
Anzahl: Mehr als 20 verfügbar
In den WarenkorbZustand: New. In.
Sprache: Englisch
Verlag: Cambridge University Press, 1973
ISBN 10: 0521098149 ISBN 13: 9780521098144
Anbieter: Kennys Bookstore, Olney, MD, USA
Zustand: New. This study highlights that both Corneille and Racine were living writers, struggling to create developing forms within the strait-jacket of neo-classical decorum. Num Pages: 336 pages, black & white illustrations. BIC Classification: 2ADF; DSBD; DSG. Category: (U) Tertiary Education (US: College). Dimension: 216 x 140 x 19. Weight in Grams: 430. . 2010. paperback. . . . . Books ship from the US and Ireland.
Sprache: Englisch
Verlag: Cambridge University Press, 1973
ISBN 10: 0521098149 ISBN 13: 9780521098144
Anbieter: AHA-BUCH GmbH, Einbeck, Deutschland
Taschenbuch. Zustand: Neu. Druck auf Anfrage Neuware - Printed after ordering - Corneille and Racine may seem like marble monuments of an unchanging typical classicism. Mr Pocock is concerned to show that each of these great dramatists was a living writer, struggling to create developing forms and that the rules of neo-classical decorum were a strait-jacket to them. We can see in their writings a hesitation between poetic drama which creates its own forms from within and naturalistic drama which opts for truth to common life and a medium. In an interesting and comprehensive examination of the two authors, Mr Pocock shows the range of Coneille's achievement, and explains that a good seal which had been dismissed as decadence or incompetence was the result of his casting about for new forms. A section on Racine shows him opting for a deepening mode of drama which rejects naturalism and is implicitly subversive of neo-classical rules.