Sprache: Englisch
Verlag: Cambridge University Press, 2008
ISBN 10: 0521057787 ISBN 13: 9780521057783
Anbieter: ThriftBooks-Dallas, Dallas, TX, USA
Paperback. Zustand: Good. No Jacket. Pages can have notes/highlighting. Spine may show signs of wear. ~ ThriftBooks: Read More, Spend Less.
Sprache: Englisch
Verlag: Cambridge University Press, 2008
ISBN 10: 0521057787 ISBN 13: 9780521057783
Anbieter: Ria Christie Collections, Uxbridge, Vereinigtes Königreich
EUR 57,41
Anzahl: Mehr als 20 verfügbar
In den WarenkorbZustand: New. In.
Sprache: Englisch
Verlag: Cambridge University Press, 2008
ISBN 10: 0521057787 ISBN 13: 9780521057783
Anbieter: Kennys Bookstore, Olney, MD, USA
Zustand: New. This book develops a theory of the nature of the cinematic medium, of the psychology of film viewing, and of film narrative. Num Pages: 332 pages, black & white illustrations. BIC Classification: APFA; HPN. Category: (P) Professional & Vocational. Dimension: 212 x 152 x 21. Weight in Grams: 520. . 2008. paperback. . . . . Books ship from the US and Ireland.
Anbieter: Revaluation Books, Exeter, Vereinigtes Königreich
EUR 77,71
Anzahl: 2 verfügbar
In den WarenkorbPaperback. Zustand: Brand New. 1st edition. 329 pages. 8.82x5.98x1.10 inches. In Stock.
Sprache: Englisch
Verlag: Cambridge University Press, 2008
ISBN 10: 0521057787 ISBN 13: 9780521057783
Anbieter: AHA-BUCH GmbH, Einbeck, Deutschland
Taschenbuch. Zustand: Neu. Druck auf Anfrage Neuware - Printed after ordering - This is a book about the nature of film: about the nature of moving images, about the viewer's relation to film, and about the kinds of narrative that film is capable of presenting. It represents a very decisive break with the semiotic and psychoanalytic theories of film which have dominated discussion. The central thesis is that film is essentially a pictorial medium and that the movement of film images is real rather than illusory. A general theory of pictorial representation is presented, which insists on the realism of pictures and the impossibility of assimilating them to language. It criticizes attempts to explain the psychology of film viewing in terms of the viewer's imaginary occupation of a position within the world of film. On the contrary, film viewing is nearly always impersonal.