Sprache: Englisch
Verlag: Cambridge University Press, 2007
ISBN 10: 0521038146 ISBN 13: 9780521038140
Anbieter: Ria Christie Collections, Uxbridge, Vereinigtes Königreich
EUR 66,61
Anzahl: Mehr als 20 verfügbar
In den WarenkorbZustand: New. In.
Sprache: Englisch
Verlag: Cambridge University Press, 2007
ISBN 10: 0521038146 ISBN 13: 9780521038140
Anbieter: Kennys Bookstore, Olney, MD, USA
Zustand: New. Discusses how the conditions surrounding the ancient transmission and cataloguing of texts may have led to the ascription of Prometheus Bound to Aeschylus. Series: Cambridge Classical Studies. Num Pages: 432 pages, black & white illustrations. BIC Classification: 2AHA; DSBB; DSG. Category: (P) Professional & Vocational. Dimension: 216 x 138 x 24. Weight in Grams: 550. . 2007. 1st Edition. paperback. . . . . Books ship from the US and Ireland.
EUR 102,94
Anzahl: 2 verfügbar
In den WarenkorbPaperback. Zustand: Brand New. 1st edition. 431 pages. 8.30x5.50x1.10 inches. In Stock.
Sprache: Englisch
Verlag: Cambridge University Press, 2007
ISBN 10: 0521038146 ISBN 13: 9780521038140
Anbieter: AHA-BUCH GmbH, Einbeck, Deutschland
Taschenbuch. Zustand: Neu. Druck auf Anfrage Neuware - Printed after ordering - Prometheus Bound was accepted without question in antiquity as the work of Aeschylus, and most modern authorities endorse this ascription. But since the nineteenth century several leading scholars have come to doubt Aeschylean authorship. Dr Griffith here provides much the most thorough and wide-ranging study of the problem that has yet been made, and concludes: 'Had Prometheus Bound been newly dug up from the sands of Oxyrhynchus. few scholars would regard it as the work of Aeschylus.' After a preliminary assessment of the external evidence, Dr Griffith examines minutely the idiosyncrasies of metre, dramatic technique, vocabulary, syntax and expression to be found in the play, applying the same tests to other plays of Aeschylus, Sophocles and Euripides in order to provide a control for his methods. In his final chapter he discusses how the conditions surrounding the ancient transmission and cataloguing of texts may have led to the ascription to Aeschylus.