Sprache: Englisch
Verlag: Cambridge University Press, 2006
ISBN 10: 0521025672 ISBN 13: 9780521025676
Anbieter: WorldofBooks, Goring-By-Sea, WS, Vereinigtes Königreich
EUR 10,45
Anzahl: 1 verfügbar
In den WarenkorbPaperback. Zustand: Very Good. The book has been read, but is in excellent condition. Pages are intact and not marred by notes or highlighting. The spine remains undamaged.
Sprache: Englisch
Verlag: Cambridge University Press, 2006
ISBN 10: 0521025672 ISBN 13: 9780521025676
Anbieter: Ria Christie Collections, Uxbridge, Vereinigtes Königreich
EUR 45,34
Anzahl: Mehr als 20 verfügbar
In den WarenkorbZustand: New. In.
Sprache: Englisch
Verlag: Cambridge University Press, 2006
ISBN 10: 0521025672 ISBN 13: 9780521025676
Anbieter: Kennys Bookstore, Olney, MD, USA
Zustand: New. In this 1993 book, Dr Still draws on literary theory to examine Rousseau's ideas about the individual and human relationships. Series Editor(s): Sheringham, Michael. Series: Cambridge Studies in French. Num Pages: 280 pages, black & white illustrations. BIC Classification: 2ADF; DSBD; HPCD. Category: (P) Professional & Vocational; (U) Tertiary Education (US: College). Dimension: 216 x 138 x 16. Weight in Grams: 360. . 2008. paperback. . . . . Books ship from the US and Ireland.
Sprache: Englisch
Verlag: Cambridge University Press, 2006
ISBN 10: 0521025672 ISBN 13: 9780521025676
Anbieter: AHA-BUCH GmbH, Einbeck, Deutschland
Taschenbuch. Zustand: Neu. Druck auf Anfrage Neuware - Printed after ordering - According to Rousseau, the best relationship between unequals is one of 'benificence', giving, receiving and repaying benefits. This 1993 book addresses the problem implicit in his writings of whether it is indeed possible for a just and generous relationship to exist between non-equals. Judith Still draws together issues in Rousseau's work which are often treated in isolation: the state, just relations between individuals, sexual politics and the constructing of a feminine identity. She analyses his works, his classical sources, and the conceptual underpinnings of his ethics, crossing the boundary between study of Rousseau as a complex and sensitive writer of fiction and autobiography and consideration of his political and ethical theory. Using techniques of reading drawn from literary theory, particularly from the work of Derrida, de Man and Starobinski, she argues that for Rousseau it is sexual difference which disturbs the practice of benificence.